ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Joseph V. Coniglio

Joseph V. Coniglio

Director, Antitrust and Innovation Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Email: [email protected]

Twitter: @JosephVConiglio

Joseph V. Coniglio is the director of antitrust and innovation, leading ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy. His work encompasses all aspects of antitrust and innovation policy, with a focus on digital platforms, monopolization policy, and dynamic competition. Joseph has published several articles addressing contemporary issues in antitrust law, competition policy, and political economy, including a paper co-authored with former FTC Chairman Timothy J. Muris titled "What Brooke Group Joined Let None Put Asunder: The Need for the Price-Cost and Recoupment Prongs in Analyzing Digital Predation" for the Global Antitrust Institute's Report for the Digital Economy.

Joseph previously worked as an associate at the law firms Sidley Austin and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, where he specialized in civil non-merger investigations and counseling for large technology and financial services companies. He also advised clients on issues involving the intersection of antitrust and intellectual property, including a brief before the Ninth Circuit in FTC v. Qualcomm. Prior to that, Joseph worked as a legal intern at both the FTC and FCC, as well as a paralegal specialist in Technology and Digital Platforms Section of the DOJ's Antitrust Division. Joseph received his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center and his B.A. in economics and philosophy from Vassar College.

Recent Publications

June 27, 2024

It’s Time for Pro-Innovation, Atlanticist European Leadership

The EU is at a strategic crossroads when it comes to techno-economic policy. As the new Commission and Parliament take office, they must choose between fidelity to the transatlantic alliance and “strategic independence,” as well as between maintaining regulatory hostility toward large tech companies and unleashing innovation in Europe.

June 24, 2024

Comments for the California Law Review Commission Study of Antitrust Law Regarding Innovation and Mergers

While ITIF applauds the Commission for its efforts to evaluate the adequacy of California’s competition laws and consider possible changes, this comment highlights concerns with both the Technology Platform and Mergers and Acquisitions Reports, specifically regarding their respective legal and economic findings from the standpoint of promoting innovation.

June 11, 2024

Comments to Kenya’s Competition Authority Regarding the Draft Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2024

Proposed changes to Kenya’s competition regime will hinder, not help its digital economy. Rather than impose substantial changes based on the false premise that digital markets require special treatment, Kenya should use existing enforcement tools to police its growing digital markets.

June 10, 2024

A Techno-Economic Agenda for the Next Administration

The next administration needs to place innovation, productivity, and competitiveness at the core of its economic policy. To that end, this report offers a comprehensive techno-economic agenda with 82 actionable policy recommendations.

June 10, 2024

Comments Before the Turkish Competition Authority Regarding Act No. 4054 on the Protection of Competition

Ex-ante regulation is not only unnecessary in view of Turkey’s growing digital markets, but likely to chill the very innovation it seeks to promote. Through a number of per se bans for behavior that is very often pro-competitive, consumers will be harmed—a fact that is already happening in Europe with its own DMA.

June 6, 2024

Is Meta Really a Monopoly? Debunking the FTC’s Market Definition Metaphysics

The FTC’s case against Meta seems to resort to quite medieval methods in trying to show, contrary to reality, that Meta has monopoly power under current legal standards.

May 15, 2024

Comments to the Indian Ministry of Corporate Affairs Regarding Digital Competition Law

Rather than allow India’s dynamic high-tech and startup ecosystem to continue to flourish, the Draft Digital Competition Bill follows the path of overbearing competition policy taken by the EU, which lacks any leading digital firms. India should instead privilege the U.S. model of markets and dynamism.

May 2, 2024

Comments for the California Law Review Commission Study of Antitrust Law Regarding Single-Firm Conduct and Concentration

While ITIF applauds the Commission for its efforts to evaluate the adequacy of California’s competition laws and consider possible changes, this comment highlights concerns with both the single-firm and concentration reports, and specifically regarding their respective legal and economic findings.

May 1, 2024

“Khanservatives” Are Wrong About Big Tech

Instead of making a Faustian bargain with neo-Brandeisians, conservatives must come to grips with what the neo-Brandeisian movement really is: a revolutionary assault on corporate America operating under the guise of “protecting democracy.”

April 4, 2024

Forbidden Fruit: DOJ Bites Apple in the Walled Garden

The Justice Department’s antitrust suit against Apple risks committing the sin of turning antitrust enforcement into de facto regulation by putting forward flawed theories of exclusionary conduct. Courts should ensure that American consumers remain able to enjoy the mobile Eden that Apple has created.

March 8, 2024

Comments to the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition on Virtual Worlds and Generative AI

The market for AR/VR technologies, though nascent, presents a multifaceted competitive landscape spanning hardware, software, and distribution. And the generative AI market is experiencing early-stage growth with no significant entry barriers evident, particularly concerning data, computational resources, and talent.

February 23, 2024

Comments to the Parliament of Canada Regarding Proposed Amendments to Canadian Competition Law

The Canadian government must ensure that policy, legislative and regulatory approaches support competition and innovation as much as possible. Unfortunately, Bills C-56 and C-59 promise to do exactly the opposite.

More publications by Joseph V. Coniglio

Recent Events and Presentations

July 16, 2024

The Brussels Effect: Digital Market Regulation in East Asia

Join us for a lively event hosted by ITIF's Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy, featuring leading antitrust experts from Taiwan, Japan, Korea, and the United States.

May 22, 2024

Can India Regulate Its Digital Boom Without Stifling Innovation?

Watch now for a timely panel discussion featuring leading antitrust lawyers from India and the United States.

May 1, 2024

US v. Apple: Whither The Limits of Antitrust?

Watch now for an expert panel discussion about the merits and implications of the DOJ’s lawsuit against Apple.

January 31, 2024

The DOJ-FTC 2023 Merger Guidelines: Evolution or Revolution?

Watch now to learn more about the ongoing efforts to reform U.S. antitrust law.

December 13, 2023

US v. Google: Implications of a Landmark Trial

Watch now for an expert panel discussion on the possible outcomes and implications of this landmark antitrust case.

October 17, 2023

Assessing the FTC’s Complaint Against Amazon

Watch this expert discussion about the merits and implications of the FTC’s landmark challenge to Amazon.

Back to Top