Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Publications: Joseph V. Coniglio

May 29, 2026

The Vatican’s “AI Monopolies” Talk Risks Encouraging Bad Tech Policy

Despite Magnifica Humanitas’s discussion of AI and economic power, today’s AI market remains highly competitive, and policymakers should be cautious about using monopoly fears to justify heavy-handed regulation.

May 28, 2026

The FTC’s Weak Case Against Uber One Could Cost Consumers

The survival of the Federal Trade Commission’s specious consumer protection claims against Uber over the rideshare company’s popular subscription service perpetuates yet another flawed lawsuit against Big Tech.

May 26, 2026

Comments to DOJ and FTC Regarding Making Improvements to the Premerger Notification and Report Form

While ITIF applauds the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission’s steps toward creating a better HSR form, it remains concerned about several means of expanding the scope of HSR review that would result in costs that far outweigh any benefits.

May 21, 2026

Comments to the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Regarding Guidance on Business Collaborations

While ITIF does not support the Biden administration’s decision to withdraw and not replace the 2000 Guidelines, now, a quarter century after their issuance, it is long past time for renewed competitor collaboration guidelines.

May 19, 2026

Creative Discussion Podcast: Tim Muris & Bruce Kobayashi on ‘Zombie Antitrust,’ Price Discrimination, and Robinson-Patman

Joseph V. Coniglio hosts two guests, Tim Muris, Foundation Professor of Law at Antonin Scalia Law School, and Bruce Kobayashi, Paige V. and Henry N. Butler Chair in Law and Economics at Antonin Scalia Law School, to discuss the Robinson-Patman Act and its renewed enforcement.

May 13, 2026

Comments to the European Commission Regarding Its Proposed Measures for Interoperability With Google Android

As the Commission continues to put forward specific measures that gatekeepers must comply with under the DMA, it is imperative that it avoid unduly chilling innovation and harming European consumers, including through reduced digital privacy and security.

May 1, 2026

Comments to the European Commission Regarding Proposed Measures for Google Search Data Sharing

ITIF submits that the Commission’s proposed measures go well beyond what should be necessary for Google to comply with the DMA and will harm consumers and chill innovation in search.

April 30, 2026

China Blocks Tech Acquisitions to Weaken America. The US Shouldn’t Follow Suit.

It is easy to be frustrated with the Chinese government and its use of merger and acquisition controls to limit the competitive advantage of American tech firms. But many policymakers in the West have enabled China’s success by weaponizing antitrust and competition laws to kill pro-competitive deals by Big Tech firms.

April 24, 2026

Comments to UK CMA Regarding Recent Developments in Relation to Apple’s and Google’s App Store Rules

To the extent intervention is deemed necessary, ITIF respectfully urges the Competition and Markets Authority to avoid following the EU DMA’s path of heavy-handed regulation when it comes to potential steering measures in the app store space and instead look to other jurisdictions, like Japan, that have taken a more tailored and flexible approach.

April 14, 2026

Creative Discussion Podcast: From the 2026 Antitrust Spring Meeting, Jonathan Barnett on How Competition Enforcers Are Undermining Competition

Joseph V. Coniglio joins guest Jonathan Barnett, Torrey H. Webb Professor of Law at the USC Gould School of Law, at the 2026 Antitrust Spring Meeting. They discuss Barnett’s new ITIF report, Europe’s innovation gap, and China’s mercantilist use of competition law.

Back to Top