Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Spectrum Policy

ITIF supports making spectrum abundant and available for productive use through all types of allocations—exclusive licenses, shared access, unlicensed—and efficient federal management. We also support advancing wireless technology with innovations like 6G standards, improved receivers, and modern spectrum sharing systems to enhance performance and meet future needs.

Joe Kane
Joe Kane

Director, Broadband and Spectrum Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

Sharing Without Daring: Dynamic Spectrum Sharing With Certainty of Access

Sharing Without Daring: Dynamic Spectrum Sharing With Certainty of Access

The dichotomy between dynamic spectrum sharing and exclusive licensing is a false one. Reliable, full-power access is possible within a dynamic sharing framework if the FCC auctions super-priority rights to commercial users.

Filling Gaps in US Spectrum Allocation: Reforms for Collaborative Management

Filling Gaps in US Spectrum Allocation: Reforms for Collaborative Management

Interrelated gaps and failures in the process and policies used to efficiently allocate spectrum demand comprehensive reform. To prevent future failures, policymakers must improve device performance, increase data gathering and sharing, and clarify the spectrum allocation process.

Five Principles for Spectrum Policy: A Primer for Policymakers

Five Principles for Spectrum Policy: A Primer for Policymakers

Spectrum policy takes engineering and technical realities as inputs to a decision-making process that is driven by normative principles. While many competing principles have had their heyday, these five are enduring guides to making spectrum work in the public interest.

More Publications and Events

October 13, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to FCC on Recommendations Approved by the World Radiocommunication Conference Advisor Committee

The benefits of NGSO systems are likely even greater in other countries than they are in the United States. The United States should lead the way to maximize the benefits of NGSOs around the world and bring other countries along with it.

September 28, 2026|Reports & Briefings

Policy Considerations for Orbital Data Centers

Orbital data centers could complement terrestrial infrastructure by processing selected workloads in space, particularly where data is generated in orbit. Their value will depend on technical performance, life cycle economics, market demand, and a regulatory environment that does not hinder testing and deployment.

September 24, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Reply Comments to FCC Regarding Reliable Access to Spectrum for Space Launch Activities

Spectrum is a critical component for space launch, and frequency coordinators play a vital role in balancing the spectrum needs of the aviation and the space sectors, both of which are essential for American technological leadership.

September 14, 2026|Blogs

Chairman Carr’s Defense of Broadcast Content Regulation Draws Historical Distinctions Without Legal Differences

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr argues that broadcast content regulation is justified by the government’s role in allocating scarce spectrum. But the historical and technical distinctions he draws between broadcasting and other media do not justify subjecting broadcast speech to lesser First Amendment protection.

July 21, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to FCC Regarding Assignment and Transfer of Control of Licenses and Authorizations Held by Globalstar to Amazon

The Commission should approve this transaction because it will serve the public interest by increasing spectrum productivity, increasing competition in the emerging D2D marketplace, and extending mobile communications coverage to remote and underserved areas.

July 15, 2026|Blogs

US Spaceports Need More Funding to Prevent a Launch Bottleneck

The United States is the global power in space, but insufficient spaceport infrastructure threatens the growth of the American space industry. Congress, NASA, and Space Force must address the problem before it undermines U.S. leadership.

July 1, 2026|Blogs

Rigid Space Spectrum Allocations Could Limit Productivity

Overly restrictive spectrum allocations have left terrestrial bands underutilized. Regulators should not repeat those mistakes as they develop new policies for the orbital economy.

June 4, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Regarding Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Capabilities

NextNav’s proposal for the FCC to unilaterally grant it greater rights at the expense of other users of the 900 MHz band is not in the public interest.

May 11, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the FCC Regarding Spectrum Abundance for ‘Weird Space Stuff’

The Commission should consider the diverse spectrum requirements of future spacecraft, clarify regulations governing access to existing commercial bands, and make additional spectrum available.

April 1, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the FCC Regarding Satellite Market Access Reciprocity

The Commission should modernize its satellite market access framework by applying the ECO-SAT reciprocity test to all foreign-licensed satellite systems seeking U.S. market access, regardless of WTO membership status.

Back to Top