National Competitiveness
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
As nations engage in a race for global advantage in innovation, ITIF champions a new policy paradigm that ensures businesses and national economies can compete successfully by spurring public and private investment in foundational areas such as research, skills, and 21st century infrastructure. Our work on competitiveness policy includes analysis of the many factors and policies driving national competitiveness, including improving innovation ecosystems and the technical capacity of high-value-added industries.

Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, and Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read Bio
Head of Policy, Centre for Canadian Innovation and Competitiveness
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
Why Korea Should Rethink Data Localization to Become an AI Powerhouse

Korea is trying to unlock high quality data for AI competitiveness, but its push for strict domestic data storage risks isolating developers from the global infrastructure and partnerships modern AI depends on. A more effective approach would protect sensitive data through targeted safeguards rather than blunt geographic restrictions that ultimately undermine innovation and market competition.
China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries

There may be no more important question for the West’s competitive position in advanced industries than whether China is becoming a rival innovator. While the evidence suggests it hasn’t yet taken the overall lead, it has pulled ahead in certain areas, and in many others Chinese firms will likely equal or surpass Western firms within a decade or so.
The Hamilton Index, 2023: China Is Running Away With Strategic Industries

China now dominates the strategically important industries in ITIF’s Hamilton Index, producing more than any other nation in absolute terms and more than all but a few others in relative terms. Its gains are coming at the expense of the United States and other G7 and OECD economies, and time is running short for policymakers to mount an industrial comeback.
More Publications and Events
November 17, 2026|Events
Save the Date: National Power Industry War Conference
Please join ITIF for an important policy conference on what U.S. policymakers must do to prevent America from suffering a catastrophic defeat in its techno-economic-trade war with China. At stake are vital production capabilities in the advanced, traded-sector industries that provide the foundation for economic strength and national security in the 21st century.
April 30, 2026|Events
Strengthening America’s Edge in Priority Technologies of the 21st Century
Please join ITIF for a virtual panel featuring authors of a new book by MIT Press, Priority Technologies: Ensuring US Security and Shared Prosperity. Experts will discuss how to strengthen U.S. innovation and industrial ecosystems and which priority technologies will be critical to long-term global economic, military, and technological leadership in the decades ahead.
April 14, 2026|Podcasts
Creative Discussion Podcast: From the 2026 Antitrust Spring Meeting, Jonathan Barnett on How Competition Enforcers Are Undermining Competition
Joseph V. Coniglio joins guest Jonathan Barnett, Torrey H. Webb Professor of Law at the USC Gould School of Law, at the 2026 Antitrust Spring Meeting. They discuss Barnett’s new ITIF report, Europe’s innovation gap, and China’s mercantilist use of competition law.
April 14, 2026|Events
Reversing Canada’s Investment Problem
Watch ITIF’s Centre for Canadian Innovation and Competitiveness' webinar featuring leading experts who will discuss what is driving Canada’s capital exodus and what it will take to fix it.
April 13, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the US International Trade Commission Regarding the Economic Impact of Revoking China’s PNTR Status
China should come into full and immediate compliance with its WTO commitments; otherwise, as a last resort, the U.S. government should revoke China’s PNTR status. But policymakers should mitigate second-order effects, particularly on national power industries.
April 13, 2026|Commentary
Fact of the Week: In 2022, China Produced Over 35 Percent of the Publications in the Top 5 Percent of Journals
As of 2022, China is producing over 35 percent of the publications in top-tier journals, up from nearly zero in 1980. At the same time, the United States has seen its share fall rapidly to about 25 percent.
April 13, 2026|Reports & Briefings
Mobilizing for Techno-Economic War, Part 3: Transforming Financial Capitalism Into National Power Capitalism
To avoid losing the techno-economic trade war with China, U.S. policymakers must rewrite the social contract at the heart of America’s 50-year-old system of financial capitalism by rebalancing the incentives to drive long-term investments in U.S. national power industries.
April 6, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: One in Ten Cars Sold in Europe in December 2025 Was Chinese
Sales of Chinese hybrids and plug-in hybrids in Europe increased by a factor of 14 between August 2024 and August 2025
April 6, 2026|Reports & Briefings
The Global Trade Battleground: US-China Competition in the Global South
Countries in the Global South are key markets for Chinese and U.S.-allied national power industries, which require scale economies to flourish. U.S. policymakers should stop viewing them as a “backyard” and recognize that they are a key battlefield in an industrial war.
April 2, 2026|Blogs
Europe’s Competitiveness Crisis Requires More Than Technocratic Tinkering
Fixing the EU’s productivity, innovation, and competitiveness crisis requires a fundamental political reorientation. Until it makes that shift, expect more reports, more tinkering, and more decline.








