Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

National Competitiveness

As nations engage in a race for global advantage in innovation, ITIF champions a new policy paradigm that ensures businesses and national economies can compete successfully by spurring public and private investment in foundational areas such as research, skills, and 21st century infrastructure. Our work on competitiveness policy includes analysis of the many factors and policies driving national competitiveness, including improving innovation ecosystems and the technical capacity of high-value-added industries.

Hilal Aka
Hilal Aka

Policy Analyst

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Robert D. Atkinson
Robert D. Atkinson

President

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Stephen Ezell
Stephen Ezell

Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, and Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Sejin Kim
Sejin Kim

Associate Director, Center for Korean Innovation and Competitiveness

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Trelysa Long
Trelysa Long

Policy Analyst

Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Read Bio
David Moschella
David Moschella

Nonresident Senior Fellow

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Meghan Ostertag
Meghan Ostertag

Research Assistant

Read Bio
Lawrence Zhang
Lawrence Zhang

Head of Policy, Centre for Canadian Innovation and Competitiveness

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries

China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries

There may be no more important question for the West’s competitive position in advanced industries than whether China is becoming a rival innovator. While the evidence suggests it hasn’t yet taken the overall lead, it has pulled ahead in certain areas, and in many others Chinese firms will likely equal or surpass Western firms within a decade or so.

A Techno-Economic Agenda for the Next Administration

A Techno-Economic Agenda for the Next Administration

The next administration needs to place innovation, productivity, and competitiveness at the core of its economic policy. To that end, this report offers a comprehensive techno-economic agenda with 82 actionable policy recommendations.

The Hamilton Index, 2023: China Is Running Away With Strategic Industries

The Hamilton Index, 2023: China Is Running Away With Strategic Industries

China now dominates the strategically important industries in ITIF’s Hamilton Index, producing more than any other nation in absolute terms and more than all but a few others in relative terms. Its gains are coming at the expense of the United States and other G7 and OECD economies, and time is running short for policymakers to mount an industrial comeback.

More Publications and Events

September 23, 2025|Events

2025 Global Trade and Innovation Policy Alliance Summit

The 2025 “South Meets North” Global Trade and Innovation Policy Alliance (GTIPA) Annual Summit will bring together leading local and international experts in Buenos Aires to exchange effective strategies in innovation-related policies.

September 17, 2025|Events

The Impact of Foreign Regulation on US Technology Leadership and Security

Please join ITIF’s Aegis Project for an expert panel discussion with leaders from the Council on Global Competitiveness and Innovation (CGCI) and Shield Capital as we examine the vital role Big Tech plays in U.S. technology leadership and national security.

August 26, 2025|Events

Embracing Competition in the Changing Broadband and Video Marketplace

Join ITIF for a timely panel discussion exploring how the broadband landscape is changing, what it means for providers and consumers, and why regulation needs to better reflect today’s dynamic environment.

August 4, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the Office of Space Commerce Regarding the EU Space Act

Space safety is an important and shared interest of governments, private industry, and consumers around the world. But a regulatory framework for it should be evidence-based and even-handed. If the EUSA proceeds, we can expect the same proliferation of copycat space regulations through the Brussels effect.

August 1, 2025|Blogs

The American Business Creed: What’s Right and What’s Wrong

To beat China, the U.S. must revitalize many of the core principles in the 1950s business creed and foster a business community that embraces a national industrial strategy.

July 25, 2025|Blogs

The False Case for Cooperation With China

Engagement always comes at a price. The CCP is realist to the core, caring only about China. When it sees the U.S. government requesting cooperation, it sees leverage.

July 25, 2025|Blogs

The AI Action Plan Puts the US Back at the Helm of Global AI Leadership

The AI Action Plan signals that the United States is not only committed to pushing the boundaries of what AI can do but also ready to shape how it is built, deployed, and governed globally.

July 25, 2025|Blogs

Why the EU’s International Digital Strategy Should Prioritize Repairing Transatlantic Cooperation

Instead of distancing itself from the United States through regulation, the EU must prioritize a transatlantic tech alliance as the only viable way to compete with China and protect shared democratic interests.

July 24, 2025|Blogs

The UK Should Learn From Trump On AI and Copyright

President Trump has rightly emphasized that AI should be allowed to learn like humans do, and unless the UK adopts a commonsense approach to AI training and copyright, it risks falling behind China in the global AI race.

July 22, 2025|Blogs

Three Cheers for Industrial Policy

Fellow advocates of industrial policy, join me in being outspoken. You have nothing to lose but your intellectual chains and U.S. techno-economic survival to gain.

Back to Top