Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Asia-Pacific

Featured

Understanding and Comparing National Innovation Systems: The U.S., Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan

Understanding and Comparing National Innovation Systems: The U.S., Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan

This collaborative project between ITIF and Chey Institute for Advanced Studies compares and contrasts the national innovation systems of five economies—the United States, Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan—to determine how well they are positioned to support innovation in key foundational and emerging technologies.

Comments to Japan’s Fair Trade Commission Regarding the Smartphone Software Competition Promotion Act

Comments to Japan’s Fair Trade Commission Regarding the Smartphone Software Competition Promotion Act

The SSCP’s broad per se prohibitions and limited cybersecurity exemption are likely to chill the very innovative behavior that is key to allowing Japan’s smartphone markets to thrive, and risk targeting a leading firm of one of its closest allies.

Assessing India’s Readiness to Assume a Greater Role in Global Semiconductor Value Chains

Assessing India’s Readiness to Assume a Greater Role in Global Semiconductor Value Chains

India has the potential to play a much more significant role in global semiconductor value chains, provided the government upholds its investment policies, maintains a conducive regulatory and business environment, and avoids measures that create unpredictability.

More Publications and Events

October 24, 2025|Blogs

Beyond Copycat Regulation: A Playbook for Korea’s Digital Partnerships

Democratic allies should co-invest, co-develop, and co-regulate emerging technologies instead of fragmenting digital markets. True leadership will come from joint strategies on export controls, standards, R&D, and talent—not sovereignty slogans.

October 23, 2025|Events

Fair Trade Commission Policy Direction Discussion: Seeking a Balance Between Regulation, Innovation, and Competitiveness

Some experts argue that stronger enforcement and new statutes are needed to level the playing field, curb abuses of market power, and protect consumers. Others caution that excessive regulation could stifle innovation, harm both small and large businesses, and weaken Korea’s global competitiveness. To shed light on these critical questions, ITIF convened an online debate in Korean.

October 12, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Letter to the Prime Minister and National Assembly of Vietnam Regarding the Proposed Law on Digital Transformation

If enacted, the draft law may inadvertently harm Vietnamese consumers, stifle digital innovation, and complicate bilateral trade relations between the United States and Vietnam to the detriment of both nations.

October 7, 2025|Blogs

Korea Enters the Global Top Four in Innovation—Now It Must Turn Knowledge Into Scaled Firms

Korea has entered the global top four economies in innovation, powered by world-class research intensity and corporate R&D. Amid a persistent input–output gap and weak startup M&A activity, the challenge now is scale: converting knowledge into globally competitive firms.

October 6, 2025|Blogs

Banning Teens from Social Media Isn’t Protection, It’s Overreach

Rather than blanket social media bans, policymakers should adopt privacy-preserving tools that empower parents and teens to manage online safety directly.

October 1, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

Korea's Basic AI Act Risks Stalling the Engine It Seeks to Build

Korea has a choice. It can show the world how to integrate strategy, promotion, and regulation in a way that builds both trust and competitiveness. Or it can serve as a cautionary tale of how regulatory overreach strangles innovation.

September 29, 2025|Reports & Briefings

One Law Sets South Korea’s AI Policy—and One Weak Link Could Break It

By uniting strategy, promotion, and regulation in a single law, South Korea has given itself a powerful instrument to shape AI—but its blunt regulatory mandates threaten to drag down the very strengths that make the act ambitious.

September 4, 2025|Blogs

A Cautionary Briefing for Korea’s New KFTC Chair: Why Platform Regulation Needs a Rethink

Korea’s incoming KFTC leadership should oppose reviving ex ante platform regulation. Such rules are unnecessary, rest on flawed premises, and would weaken both innovation and strategic alliances.

September 3, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

How Not to Lose Korea’s Advanced Industries

Korea needs stronger domestic policies to shore up its advanced industries, such as restoring a robust investment tax credit and expanding its weak R&D tax credit. But without working with allies, Korea will not win versus China.

August 27, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

Korea’s Won Stablecoin Debate Is Missing the Point: It’s Not Who. It’s How.

If Korea wants a won stablecoin that matters, give it work on day one: Settle spot ETF trades; connect to tokenized securities (STO); cut remittance costs; and settle cross-border B2B invoices in KRW with fewer hops. Without real uses, the token drifts into speculation.

Back to Top