Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
More Publications and Events
October 29, 2025|Events
DOJ v. Google: What to Expect With Ad Tech Remedies
Please join ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss this landmark decision, its implications for the ad tech industry, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.
October 20, 2025|Events
Tech Policy 101: Fall 2025 Educational Seminar Series for Congressional and Federal Staff
ITIF’s fall seminar course will explore core emerging technologies that are reshaping our world and the public policy challenges and opportunities influencing their development and application. The course is open to congressional and federal staff only.
October 17, 2025|Blogs
The Brussels Effect Comes to Brasília: Why Its New Digital Markets Bill Misses the Mark
Brazil’s Digital Markets Bill promises to tame tech giants, but in reality, it threatens to import Europe’s flawed regulatory experiment—punishing innovation more than protecting consumers
October 16, 2025|Blogs
Schumpeter’s Vindication: The Enduring Link Between Scale and Innovation
Economic evidence continues to show positive effects of firm size on innovation. Scale matters for innovation and economic growth, and antitrust policy should not be constrained by the “big is bad” notions of today’s antitrust populists.
October 12, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Letter to the Prime Minister and National Assembly of Vietnam Regarding the Proposed Law on Digital Transformation
If enacted, the draft law may inadvertently harm Vietnamese consumers, stifle digital innovation, and complicate bilateral trade relations between the United States and Vietnam to the detriment of both nations.
October 10, 2025|Blogs
Europe’s Interoperability Push Undermines Western Tech Leadership
The EU’s overbroad interoperability mandates target U.S. tech firms, delay new features for European users, and open the door for China to challenge Western tech leadership.
October 2, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the European Commission on the Revision of EU Antitrust Procedures
The antitrust procedural framework can be improved by measures that create a less burdensome and more objective evidentiary process, as well as provide investigated parties with greater access to the Commission’s complete file.
September 29, 2025|Blogs
Response to NYT Guest Essay "Google Wins, We Lose"
DOJ’s proposed breakup never made sense. Judges are supposed to apply the law, not simply deliver the results desired by progressives and populists.
September 24, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the European Commission for Its First Review of the Digital Markets Act
DMA is not an effective tool of competition policy. On the contrary, it has resulted in demonstrable consumer welfare losses, chilled procompetitive behavior, and even harmed small businesses. What’s more, it has done so by imposing obligations and penalties that inexcusably target America’s leading technology companies.
September 23, 2025|Events
DOJ v. Google: The Remedies Decision and the Future of Search
Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the landmark Google Search decision, its implications for the future of search, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.