Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Antitrust

ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Giorgio Castiglia
Giorgio Castiglia

Economic Policy Analyst

Read Bio
Joseph V. Coniglio
Joseph V. Coniglio

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Hadi Houalla
Hadi Houalla

Research Assistant

Read Bio

Featured

Rethinking Antitrust: The Case for Dynamic Competition Policy

Rethinking Antitrust: The Case for Dynamic Competition Policy

Antitrust policy relies too heavily on static models that focus on prices and market shares while treating innovation as external. A dynamic approach that views competition as a process of innovation is better suited to guiding policy in today’s technology-driven economy.

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

In the 2017 law journal article that established her reputation, now FTC Chair Lina Khan ignored or misapplied the economics of two-sided markets, mischaracterized competitive conditions, and did not consider the pro-competitive effects of Amazon’s conduct.

More Publications and Events

November 13, 2025|Events

A Conversation with David Teece: Dynamic Competition and the Future of Antitrust

Please join ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy for a virtual fireside chat with Professor David Teece, who will explore how dynamic competition redefines the economic foundations of antitrust and what it means for enforcement to better account for innovation, entrepreneurship, and dynamic capabilities in today’s most consequential cases.

November 12, 2025|Blogs

iRobot's Avoidable Predicament: An Antitrust Enforcement Blunder

The failure of the Amazon/iRobot transaction, which was opposed by EU and U.S. antitrust authorities, has had catastrophic consequences for the American robotics firm and played into the hands of Chinese robot manufacturing rivals.

November 12, 2025|Blogs

Yes, Lina Khan Is a Marxist

The neo-Brandeisian movement cleverly repackages Marxist ideology under the guise of antitrust.

November 7, 2025|Blogs

How the Digital Markets Act Let Consumers Down

Despite its promise to make Europe’s digital economy fairer and more open, the Digital Markets Act has instead made life online slower, costlier, and more complicated for the very consumers it was meant to protect.

November 4, 2025|Blogs

Big Tech Goes to SCOTUS? Google’s Petition in Epic v. Google Makes the Case

Google’s petition in Epic v. Google raises big questions about key antitrust liability and remedial standards, foreshadowing similar arguments on appeal in the DOJ v. Google search case.

November 3, 2025|Blogs

Better Regulation, Not More: Rethinking Korea’s Competition Policy for the Next Decade

As the KFTC enters its fifth decade, it is clear its mission must evolve—from control to credibility, and from compliance to competitiveness.

October 30, 2025|Blogs

Canada’s Amazon Test: Encouraging Competition or Undermining It?

Canada’s first major test of its reformed competition law centers on Amazon’s pricing rules, but the Competition Bureau’s case risks punishing a policy that lowers prices for consumers and mistaking competition on the merits for anticompetitive conduct.

October 29, 2025|Events

DOJ v. Google: What to Expect With Ad Tech Remedies

Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss this landmark decision, its implications for the ad tech industry, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.

October 29, 2025|Presentations

Big Tech and Europe

Joseph Coniglio speaks about Europe's big tech regulations at an event hosted by Broadband Breakfast.

October 27, 2025|Blogs

No, Microsoft’s Recent Changes Do Not Prove the Activision Deal Was Anticompetitive

Post-deal layoffs and price increases do not prove that an acquisition harmed competition, contrary to the recent rhetoric around the Microsoft/Activision deal.

Back to Top