Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
More Publications and Events
November 13, 2025|Events
A Conversation with David Teece: Dynamic Competition and the Future of Antitrust
Please join ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy for a virtual fireside chat with Professor David Teece, who will explore how dynamic competition redefines the economic foundations of antitrust and what it means for enforcement to better account for innovation, entrepreneurship, and dynamic capabilities in today’s most consequential cases.
November 12, 2025|Blogs
iRobot's Avoidable Predicament: An Antitrust Enforcement Blunder
The failure of the Amazon/iRobot transaction, which was opposed by EU and U.S. antitrust authorities, has had catastrophic consequences for the American robotics firm and played into the hands of Chinese robot manufacturing rivals.
November 12, 2025|Blogs
Yes, Lina Khan Is a Marxist
The neo-Brandeisian movement cleverly repackages Marxist ideology under the guise of antitrust.
November 7, 2025|Blogs
How the Digital Markets Act Let Consumers Down
Despite its promise to make Europe’s digital economy fairer and more open, the Digital Markets Act has instead made life online slower, costlier, and more complicated for the very consumers it was meant to protect.
November 4, 2025|Blogs
Big Tech Goes to SCOTUS? Google’s Petition in Epic v. Google Makes the Case
Google’s petition in Epic v. Google raises big questions about key antitrust liability and remedial standards, foreshadowing similar arguments on appeal in the DOJ v. Google search case.
November 3, 2025|Blogs
Better Regulation, Not More: Rethinking Korea’s Competition Policy for the Next Decade
As the KFTC enters its fifth decade, it is clear its mission must evolve—from control to credibility, and from compliance to competitiveness.
October 30, 2025|Blogs
Canada’s Amazon Test: Encouraging Competition or Undermining It?
Canada’s first major test of its reformed competition law centers on Amazon’s pricing rules, but the Competition Bureau’s case risks punishing a policy that lowers prices for consumers and mistaking competition on the merits for anticompetitive conduct.
October 29, 2025|Events
DOJ v. Google: What to Expect With Ad Tech Remedies
Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss this landmark decision, its implications for the ad tech industry, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.
October 29, 2025|Presentations
Big Tech and Europe
Joseph Coniglio speaks about Europe's big tech regulations at an event hosted by Broadband Breakfast.
October 27, 2025|Blogs
No, Microsoft’s Recent Changes Do Not Prove the Activision Deal Was Anticompetitive
Post-deal layoffs and price increases do not prove that an acquisition harmed competition, contrary to the recent rhetoric around the Microsoft/Activision deal.




