Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Antitrust

ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Giorgio Castiglia
Giorgio Castiglia

Economic Policy Analyst

Read Bio
Joseph V. Coniglio
Joseph V. Coniglio

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Hadi Houalla
Hadi Houalla

Research Assistant

Read Bio
Lilla Nóra Kiss
Lilla Nóra Kiss

Senior Policy Analyst

Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Read Bio

Featured

Rethinking Antitrust: The Case for Dynamic Competition Policy

Rethinking Antitrust: The Case for Dynamic Competition Policy

Antitrust policy relies too heavily on static models that focus on prices and market shares while treating innovation as external. A dynamic approach that views competition as a process of innovation is better suited to guiding policy in today’s technology-driven economy.

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

In the 2017 law journal article that established her reputation, now FTC Chair Lina Khan ignored or misapplied the economics of two-sided markets, mischaracterized competitive conditions, and did not consider the pro-competitive effects of Amazon’s conduct.

More Publications and Events

November 13, 2025|Events

A Conversation with David Teece: Dynamic Competition and the Future of Antitrust

Please join ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy for a virtual fireside chat with Professor David Teece, who will explore how dynamic competition redefines the economic foundations of antitrust and what it means for enforcement to better account for innovation, entrepreneurship, and dynamic capabilities in today’s most consequential cases.

November 4, 2025|Blogs

Big Tech Goes to SCOTUS? Google’s Petition in Epic v. Google Makes the Case

Google’s petition in Epic v. Google raises big questions about key antitrust liability and remedial standards, foreshadowing similar arguments on appeal in the DOJ v. Google search case.

November 3, 2025|Blogs

Better Regulation, Not More: Rethinking Korea’s Competition Policy for the Next Decade

As the KFTC enters its fifth decade, it is clear its mission must evolve—from control to credibility, and from compliance to competitiveness.

October 29, 2025|Events

DOJ v. Google: What to Expect With Ad Tech Remedies

Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss this landmark decision, its implications for the ad tech industry, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.

October 27, 2025|Blogs

No, Microsoft’s Recent Changes Do Not Prove the Activision Deal Was Anticompetitive

Post-deal layoffs and price increases do not prove that an acquisition harmed competition, contrary to the recent rhetoric around the Microsoft/Activision deal.

October 24, 2025|Blogs

Beyond Copycat Regulation: A Playbook for Korea’s Digital Partnerships

Democratic allies should co-invest, co-develop, and co-regulate emerging technologies instead of fragmenting digital markets. True leadership will come from joint strategies on export controls, standards, R&D, and talent—not sovereignty slogans.

October 24, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to EU Regarding the Draft Revised Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation and Technology Transfer Guidelines

ITIF supports most of the proposed updates to the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation—especially those on market share thresholds, data licensing, and technology pools—but warns that the new safe harbour for licensing negotiation groups could enable anticompetitive buyer collusion and protectionist enforcement unless stricter safeguards are added.

October 23, 2025|Events

Fair Trade Commission Policy Direction Discussion: Seeking a Balance Between Regulation, Innovation, and Competitiveness

Some experts argue that stronger enforcement and new statutes are needed to level the playing field, curb abuses of market power, and protect consumers. Others caution that excessive regulation could stifle innovation, harm both small and large businesses, and weaken Korea’s global competitiveness. To shed light on these critical questions, ITIF convened an online debate in Korean.

October 20, 2025|Events

Tech Policy 101: Fall 2025 Educational Seminar Series for Congressional and Federal Staff

ITIF’s fall seminar course will explore core emerging technologies that are reshaping our world and the public policy challenges and opportunities influencing their development and application. The course is open to congressional and federal staff only.

October 17, 2025|Blogs

The Brussels Effect Comes to Brasília: Why Its New Digital Markets Bill Misses the Mark

Brazil’s Digital Markets Bill promises to tame tech giants, but in reality, it threatens to import Europe’s flawed regulatory experiment—punishing innovation more than protecting consumers

Back to Top