Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioMore Publications and Events
October 20, 2025|Events
Tech Policy 101: Fall 2025 Educational Seminar Series for Congressional and Federal Staff
ITIF’s fall seminar course will explore core emerging technologies that are reshaping our world and the public policy challenges and opportunities influencing their development and application. The course is open to congressional and federal staff only.
October 2, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the European Commission on the Revision of EU Antitrust Procedures
The antitrust procedural framework can be improved by measures that create a less burdensome and more objective evidentiary process, as well as provide investigated parties with greater access to the Commission’s complete file.
September 29, 2025|Commentary
Response to NYT Guest Essay "Google Wins, We Lose"
DOJ’s proposed breakup never made sense. Judges are supposed to apply the law, not simply deliver the results desired by progressives and populists.
September 24, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the European Commission for Its First Review of the Digital Markets Act
DMA is not an effective tool of competition policy. On the contrary, it has resulted in demonstrable consumer welfare losses, chilled procompetitive behavior, and even harmed small businesses. What’s more, it has done so by imposing obligations and penalties that inexcusably target America’s leading technology companies.
September 23, 2025|Events
DOJ v. Google: The Remedies Decision and the Future of Search
Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the landmark Google Search decision, its implications for the future of search, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.
September 19, 2025|Blogs
Five Persistent Myths About Big Tech
Populists on the right and left continue to peddle myths about the U.S. technology industry and its “Big Tech” firms. Five persistent myths in particular risk spurring regulations that would stifle innovation, slow growth, and weaken U.S. competitiveness.
September 18, 2025|Blogs
Breakdown, Not Breakup: Taking Stock of the Google Remedies Decision
While Judge Mehta’s opinion may be one small step forward for Google, it is one giant leap toward defeating the neo-Brandeisians’ agenda to break up Big Tech.
September 17, 2025|Presentations
Global Challenges of Digital Regulation
Lilla Nóra Kiss speaks on a global panel at Comenius University.
September 15, 2025|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the US Justice Department Regarding State Laws Adversely Affecting the Economy or Interstate Commerce
There are many technology policy issues where states have created a patchwork of regulation that impose duplicative costs on businesses, cause confusion for consumers, and act as a drain on the U.S. economy. In order to address these issues, federal preemption would streamline regulation and decrease costs and confusion.
September 4, 2025|Blogs
A Cautionary Briefing for Korea’s New KFTC Chair: Why Platform Regulation Needs a Rethink
Korea’s incoming KFTC leadership should oppose reviving ex ante platform regulation. Such rules are unnecessary, rest on flawed premises, and would weaken both innovation and strategic alliances.