Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioMore Publications and Events
April 16, 2025|Events
The DMA’s Annual Review: A Global Perspective on Digital Competition Regulation
Please join ITIF for a lively virtual discussion with experts from diverse regulatory landscapes as they unpack the DMA’s real-world impact, analyze global trends in digital regulation, and evaluate whether ex-ante rules are the right path forward for competition.
April 10, 2025|Events
The DOJ v. Google Saga Continues: What’s at Stake in the Search Remedies Trial?
Please join ITIF for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the key issues going to trial, the implications for Google and the future of search, and what the case means for U.S. antitrust law and the broader “big tech” debate.
March 31, 2025|Reports & Briefings
A Policymaker’s Guide to Digital Antitrust Regulation
Rather than adopt the European Union’s model for regulating competition, policymakers considering how to govern digital markets should carefully evaluate whether digital antitrust regulation is justified and consider whether concerns about anticompetitive behavior can be addressed with less intrusive and more cost-effective tools.
March 27, 2025|Blogs
The EU Should Resist Calls to Regulate AI Under the DMA
Europe risks undermining its competitiveness in the AI race by heeding calls to extend the DMA to AI and cloud services.
March 21, 2025|Blogs
Does the DMA Intentionally Target US Companies?
While the DMA may be motivated by Europe’s commitment to its long-held ordoliberal model of competition policy, its disproportionate effects on U.S. firms are intentional.
March 7, 2025|Blogs
The Global Spread of Protectionist Policies That Squeeze American Tech Companies
A growing proliferation of antitrust regulations, content-moderation requirements, data-localization mandates, digital service taxes, exorbitant fines and fees, and local content requirements reveals a clear pattern: They are designed to unfairly burden and extract revenue from American Big Tech.
March 4, 2025|Events
Competition Policy in the Trump Administration: The Future of Conservative Antitrust and the FTC
Watch the webinar event where panlists discussed how antitrust enforcement might change with the new administration, whether the Trump enforcers will carry forward any of the neo-Brandeisian policies, and what the future may have in store for the FTC.
March 4, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles
Korea’s Digital Gamble: Will New Tech Rules Hurt Innovation and Help China?
South Korea risks harming its consumers, economy, and relationship with the United States by adopting Europe's flawed digital competition regulations.
February 28, 2025|Blogs
The Tech Oligarchy That Isn’t: Big Tech’s Power Is Overstated
Critics on both sides of the aisle view the “private power” of dominant tech firms as unassailable and protected by anticompetitive conduct, but their alleged monopoly power is often overstated.
February 28, 2025|Blogs
UK Antitrust Enforcers Target Google in Inaugural DMCC Investigation
The Competition and Markets Authority’s looming decision to label Google with significant market status is the first step in a process that threatens to degrade the British consumer experience without achieving meaningful benefits to competition.