Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Technology Diffusion

ITIF formulates, evaluates, and promotes policies and programs to spur technology transfer, commercialization, and widespread adoption of new innovations across all sectors of the economy.

Technology Diffusion

Robert D. Atkinson
Robert D. Atkinson

President

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Stephen Ezell
Stephen Ezell

Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, and Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Sejin Kim
Sejin Kim

Associate Director, Center for Korean Innovation and Competitiveness

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Lawrence Zhang
Lawrence Zhang

Head of Policy, Centre for Canadian Innovation and Competitiveness

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Publications and Events

December 5, 2025|Blogs

Getting Korea's Narrative Right: AGI Is a Productivity Shock, Not a Justification for Public Compute

Some Korean commentary misreads AGI as a threat to labor and a rationale for public compute. In reality, AGI is better understood as a productivity shock that expands economic output. Resetting the narrative is essential for Korea to pursue policies that strengthen private-sector capacity, support AI diffusion, and enhance innovation.

December 1, 2025|Blogs

Fact of the Week: GDPR Reduced EU Venture Capital Investment in Technology by 26 Percent Relative to the United States

Between 2015 and 2024, the cumulative VC investment gap came to $1.21 trillion.

October 31, 2025|Blogs

Tracking and Copying Global Best-in-Class Productivity Practices

Governments must treat productivity growth as a deliberate pursuit, not a happy accident. A global effort to identify, study, and replicate best-in-class practices would move us closer to that goal.

October 3, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the European Commission Regarding the European Innovation Act

For the EIA to succeed, the Commission needs to address Europe’s broader economic policy environment. The EU’s reliance on the precautionary principle has entrenched a risk-first mindset that slows innovation and diverts resources away from competition and quality improvement.

September 23, 2025|Podcasts

Podcast: Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Startup Challenges, With Stephen Ezell

Stephen Ezell sat down with Prof. Mahesh Panchagnula to explore the realities of innovation and entrepreneurship.

July 18, 2025|Blogs

Mission-Oriented Innovation or Mission-Enabled Innovation?

What’s more likely to boost growth and tech leadership: a targeted innovation strategy for robotics or one focused on cleaner oceans? Just asking.

July 14, 2025|Blogs

Fact of the Week: Venture Capital Funding and Advanced Technology Adoption Have a Strong, Positive Impact on Start-Up Success

In a random sample of start-ups collected from U.S. Census Bureau data, just 11.6 percent adopted advanced technology; however, these firms accounted for 39 percent of total employment and 44 percent of total revenue in the sample.

July 7, 2025|Blogs

Canada Doesn’t Have an Innovation System: It Has 134 Programs

Canada needs a new federal institution that makes its innovation system more than the sum of its parts: a Canadian Innovation and Industrial Transformation Agency. This institution wouldn’t replace programs. It would govern them coherently, strategically, and at speed.

February 20, 2025|Reports & Briefings

Understanding and Comparing National Innovation Systems: The U.S., Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan

This collaborative project between ITIF and Chey Institute for Advanced Studies compares and contrasts the national innovation systems of five economies—the United States, Korea, China, Japan, and Taiwan—to determine how well they are positioned to support innovation in key foundational and emerging technologies.

January 6, 2025|Blogs

Tech Hubs or Tech Dispersion?

With the CHIPS and Science Act, Congress intended to concentrate resources in a select few places to help them become self-sustaining, globally competitive advanced-technology regions. Unfortunately, four separate agencies established regional tech hub programs, disbursing awards across 48 states. Going forward, Congress needs to decide on one approach or the other.

Back to Top