Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Data Innovation

As every sector of the global economy and nearly every facet of modern society undergo digital transformation, ITIF advocates for policies that spur not just the development of IT innovations, but more importantly their adoption and use throughout the economy. ITIF’s Center for Data Innovation formulates and promotes pragmatic public policies designed to maximize the benefits of data-driven innovation in the public and private sectors.

Ayesha Bhatti
Ayesha Bhatti

Head of Digital Policy, UK & EU

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Daniel Castro
Daniel Castro

Vice President and Director, Center for Data Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Eli Clemens
Eli Clemens

Policy Analyst

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Matthew Kilcoyne
Matthew Kilcoyne

Policy Analyst

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Hodan Omaar
Hodan Omaar

Senior Policy Manager

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio

Featured

Picking the Right Policy Solutions for AI Concerns

Picking the Right Policy Solutions for AI Concerns

Some concerns are legitimate, but others are not. Some require immediate regulatory responses, but many do not. And a few require regulations addressing AI specifically, but most do not.

Exploring Data-Sharing Models to Maximize Benefits From Data

Exploring Data-Sharing Models to Maximize Benefits From Data

Data-driven innovation has the potential to be a massive force for progress. Data sharing enables organizations to increase the utility and value of the data they control and gain access to additional data controlled by others.

Overcoming Barriers to Data Sharing in the United States

Overcoming Barriers to Data Sharing in the United States

Without policy change, the United States will continue trending toward data siloes—an inefficient world in which data is isolated, and its benefits are restricted.

Digital Equity 2.0: How to Close the Data Divide

Digital Equity 2.0: How to Close  the Data Divide

Unlike the digital divide, many ignore the data divide or argue that the way to close it is to collect vastly less data. But without substantial efforts to increase data representation and access, certain individuals and communities will be left behind in an increasingly data-driven world.

More Publications and Events

August 1, 2025|Blogs

AI Can Help Clean Philadelphia Up and Give Workers a Better Deal

Philadelphia’s recent trash crisis highlights the need for a smarter approach to city services—one that uses low-cost AI tools to improve sanitation, reduce costs, and free up resources to better support the city’s workers.

July 25, 2025|Blogs

The AI Action Plan Puts the US Back at the Helm of Global AI Leadership

The AI Action Plan signals that the United States is not only committed to pushing the boundaries of what AI can do but also ready to shape how it is built, deployed, and governed globally.

July 24, 2025|Blogs

The UK Should Learn From Trump On AI and Copyright

President Trump has rightly emphasized that AI should be allowed to learn like humans do, and unless the UK adopts a commonsense approach to AI training and copyright, it risks falling behind China in the global AI race.

July 21, 2025|Blogs

Letting US Companies Sell Second-Tier Chips to China Is the Right Move

The Trump administration should maintain export controls where they clearly advance national security. But it should also ensure that U.S. companies can compete globally, reinvest in innovation, and remain central to the technologies that will shape the future.

July 14, 2025|Blogs

Without a Federal Moratorium, US AI Policy Will Fragment Further

Congress’ decision to reject a federal moratorium on state-level AI regulation is a missed opportunity. Without a pause, the United States continues to face a patchwork of state laws that confuses consumers, burdens businesses, and slows innovation.

July 10, 2025|Blogs

Brussels Risks Prioritising Symbolism Over Substance in Cloud Procurement

In its push for digital sovereignty, the European Commission is reportedly planning to replace Microsoft Azure with the French cloud provider OVHcloud or another European alternative. But this move, while politically symbolic, would be costly. Far from enhancing security, this migration would sacrifice sound procurement and EU legal obligations in service of a hollow vision of digital nationalism.

July 2, 2025|Blogs

Five Reasons Why Critics Were Wrong About the AI Moratorium

The Senate's decision to remove the 10-year AI moratorium is a major setback for U.S. leadership in AI. The vote isn’t surprising given the criticism of the moratorium, but those critiques are misguided, and here's why.

July 1, 2025|Blogs

South Korea Should Reform Outdated and Protectionist Mapping Data Restrictions

South Korea’s export restrictions on mapping data act as a protectionist measure that unfairly limits competition from foreign firms. Korean policymakers should reform these rules not only to remove this non-tariff trade barrier but also to ensure that they do not hold back the use of geospatial data by emerging AI tools.

June 29, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to Senators Heinrich and Rounds Regarding the American Science Acceleration Project

The American Science Acceleration Project (ASAP) is a timely effort to modernize the infrastructure that powers U.S. research. By improving how science is organized, resourced, and executed, ASAP can help unlock faster breakthroughs across a range of disciplines.

June 20, 2025|Blogs

German State Prioritizes Politics Over Practical Technology Solutions

Schleswig-Holstein’s move to drop Microsoft for open-source tools reflects costly digital protectionism driven by politics, not practicality. EU governments should focus on evidence-based tech procurement over nationalist agendas.

Back to Top