ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Antitrust

ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Giorgio Castiglia
Giorgio Castiglia

Economic Policy Analyst

Read Bio
Joseph V. Coniglio
Joseph V. Coniglio

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Hadi Houalla
Hadi Houalla

Research Assistant

Read Bio
Lilla Nóra Kiss
Lilla Nóra Kiss

Senior Policy Analyst

Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Read Bio

Featured

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

In the 2017 law journal article that established her reputation, now FTC Chair Lina Khan ignored or misapplied the economics of two-sided markets, mischaracterized competitive conditions, and did not consider the pro-competitive effects of Amazon’s conduct.

More Publications and Events

April 16, 2025|Events

The DMA’s Annual Review: A Global Perspective on Digital Competition Regulation

Please join ITIF for a lively virtual discussion with experts from diverse regulatory landscapes as they unpack the DMA’s real-world impact, analyze global trends in digital regulation, and evaluate whether ex-ante rules are the right path forward for competition.

April 10, 2025|Events

The DOJ v. Google Saga Continues: What’s at Stake in the Search Remedies Trial?

Please join ITIF for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the key issues going to trial, the implications for Google and the future of search, and what the case means for U.S. antitrust law and the broader “big tech” debate.

March 21, 2025|Blogs

Does the DMA Intentionally Target US Companies?

While the DMA may be motivated by Europe’s commitment to its long-held ordoliberal model of competition policy, its disproportionate effects on U.S. firms are intentional.

March 7, 2025|Blogs

The Global Spread of Protectionist Policies That Squeeze American Tech Companies

A growing proliferation of antitrust regulations, content-moderation requirements, data-localization mandates, digital service taxes, exorbitant fines and fees, and local content requirements reveals a clear pattern: They are designed to unfairly burden and extract revenue from American Big Tech.

March 4, 2025|Events

Competition Policy in the Trump Administration: The Future of Conservative Antitrust and the FTC

Watch the webinar event where panlists discussed how antitrust enforcement might change with the new administration, whether the Trump enforcers will carry forward any of the neo-Brandeisian policies, and what the future may have in store for the FTC.

March 4, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

Korea’s Digital Gamble: Will New Tech Rules Hurt Innovation and Help China?

South Korea risks harming its consumers, economy, and relationship with the United States by adopting Europe's flawed digital competition regulations.

February 28, 2025|Blogs

The Tech Oligarchy That Isn’t: Big Tech’s Power Is Overstated

Critics on both sides of the aisle view the “private power” of dominant tech firms as unassailable and protected by anticompetitive conduct, but their alleged monopoly power is often overstated.

February 28, 2025|Blogs

UK Antitrust Enforcers Target Google in Inaugural DMCC Investigation

The Competition and Markets Authority’s looming decision to label Google with significant market status is the first step in a process that threatens to degrade the British consumer experience without achieving meaningful benefits to competition.

February 26, 2025|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

The EU’s Competitiveness Compass: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly?

The European Commission’s Competitiveness Compass rightly identifies Europe’s economic and innovation challenges but proposes misguided solutions.

February 26, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the Australian Treasury Regarding Proposal of a New Digital Competition Regime

By deciding not to pursue digital competition regulation, Australia can avoid the problems that are already materializing as a result of ex-ante regimes like the EU’s DMA.

Back to Top