Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Antitrust

ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.

Giorgio Castiglia
Giorgio Castiglia

Economic Policy Analyst

Read Bio
Joseph V. Coniglio
Joseph V. Coniglio

Director, Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Hadi Houalla
Hadi Houalla

Research Assistant

Read Bio
Lilla Nóra Kiss
Lilla Nóra Kiss

Senior Policy Analyst

Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy

Read Bio

Featured

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

The Flawed Analysis Underlying Calls for Antitrust Reform: Revisiting Lina Khan’s “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox”

In the 2017 law journal article that established her reputation, now FTC Chair Lina Khan ignored or misapplied the economics of two-sided markets, mischaracterized competitive conditions, and did not consider the pro-competitive effects of Amazon’s conduct.

More Publications and Events

October 20, 2025|Events

Tech Policy 101: Fall 2025 Educational Seminar Series for Congressional and Federal Staff

ITIF’s fall seminar course will explore core emerging technologies that are reshaping our world and the public policy challenges and opportunities influencing their development and application. The course is open to congressional and federal staff only.

October 2, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the European Commission on the Revision of EU Antitrust Procedures

The antitrust procedural framework can be improved by measures that create a less burdensome and more objective evidentiary process, as well as provide investigated parties with greater access to the Commission’s complete file.

September 29, 2025|Commentary

Response to NYT Guest Essay "Google Wins, We Lose"

DOJ’s proposed breakup never made sense. Judges are supposed to apply the law, not simply deliver the results desired by progressives and populists.

September 24, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the European Commission for Its First Review of the Digital Markets Act

DMA is not an effective tool of competition policy. On the contrary, it has resulted in demonstrable consumer welfare losses, chilled procompetitive behavior, and even harmed small businesses. What’s more, it has done so by imposing obligations and penalties that inexcusably target America’s leading technology companies.

September 23, 2025|Events

DOJ v. Google: The Remedies Decision and the Future of Search

Watch now for a virtual panel with top experts who will discuss the landmark Google Search decision, its implications for the future of search, and what it means for Google as its antitrust battles with the DOJ continue.

September 19, 2025|Blogs

Five Persistent Myths About Big Tech

Populists on the right and left continue to peddle myths about the U.S. technology industry and its “Big Tech” firms. Five persistent myths in particular risk spurring regulations that would stifle innovation, slow growth, and weaken U.S. competitiveness.

September 18, 2025|Blogs

Breakdown, Not Breakup: Taking Stock of the Google Remedies Decision

While Judge Mehta’s opinion may be one small step forward for Google, it is one giant leap toward defeating the neo-Brandeisians’ agenda to break up Big Tech.

September 17, 2025|Presentations

Global Challenges of Digital Regulation

Lilla Nóra Kiss speaks on a global panel at Comenius University.

September 15, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the US Justice Department Regarding State Laws Adversely Affecting the Economy or Interstate Commerce

There are many technology policy issues where states have created a patchwork of regulation that impose duplicative costs on businesses, cause confusion for consumers, and act as a drain on the U.S. economy. In order to address these issues, federal preemption would streamline regulation and decrease costs and confusion.

September 4, 2025|Blogs

A Cautionary Briefing for Korea’s New KFTC Chair: Why Platform Regulation Needs a Rethink

Korea’s incoming KFTC leadership should oppose reviving ex ante platform regulation. Such rules are unnecessary, rest on flawed premises, and would weaken both innovation and strategic alliances.

Back to Top