Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.
Featured
More Publications and Events
October 20, 2026|Events
Korean Competition Policy and the Stakes for the US-Korea Relationship
Join ITIF for a panel discussion with international experts on a forthcoming report analyzing a decade of previously uncompiled KFTC enforcement data, what its findings mean for U.S.–Korea economic relations, and how policymakers in both countries should respond.
October 8, 2026|Podcasts
Podcast: Competition and Innovation, With Jack Nicastro
Jack Nicastro sat down with Richard Morrison to discuss antitrust law, the consumer welfare standard, how to be an entrepreneur, and the human value of economic growth.
October 2, 2026|Blogs
Developing Safety Standards Is Not Inherently Anticompetitive
Developing common AI safety standards does not, by itself, undermine competition. Policymakers should not force companies to choose between competing vigorously and working together to prevent serious safety risks. Antitrust law should allow both.
October 2, 2026|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles
California’s Paramount Settlement Doesn’t Stop at Antitrust
More troubling than any effects on competition the decree will have is what it does to antitrust itself: It uses competition law to enact industrial policy goals that have little to do with competition.
September 30, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Korea Fair Trade Commission Regarding Merger Notification Guidelines
The Proposed Amendment would have the effect of “protecting” startups by frustrating larger firms from acquiring their founders and employees. Adopting such a policy would predictably chill incentives to innovate.
September 28, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Federal Trade Commission Regarding Personalized Pricing
Mandating broader transparency around algorithmic or personalized pricing requires congressional legislation to weigh costs and benefits, and the FTC should revise its policy statement to target law violations without restricting legitimate personalized pricing.
September 19, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to National Assembly of Vietnam Regarding the Draft Law Amending and Supplementing Certain Articles
ITIF applauds the Ministry for removing much of the digital-platform specific language from the earlier version of the Draft Law, but remains concerned that what remains in the proposed amendments, especially to Articles 26 and 27, may result in de facto discrimination against digital platforms.
September 15, 2026|Podcasts
Creative Discussion Podcast: Steve Salop on Post-Chicago Antitrust, Raising Rivals’ Costs, and Modern Economic Analysis
Joseph V. Coniglio talks with Georgetown emeritus professor Steven C. Salop about the rise of strategic oligopoly models, the evolving lawyer–economist relationship, and debates over consumer welfare versus broader goals like democracy and inequality.
September 4, 2026|Blogs
Antitrust Overreach Comes for Zillow
Antitrust battles over digital markets have spread well beyond Big Tech to other leading online firms, threatening productivity and dynamism across the digital economy.
September 3, 2026|Blogs
Google’s Spam Policy Change Shows the Costs of DMA Compliance
To avoid a potentially exorbitant Digital Markets Act fine, Google is changing its spam policy in a way that may degrade Search, providing yet another example of the European Commission compelling American firms to weaken their services.



