Antitrust
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF’s Schumpeter Project on Competition Policy conducts legal and economic research, publishes actionable policy analysis, organizes high-level discussions, and engages with policymakers to rethink the relationship between competition and innovation for the benefit of consumers, innovative companies, the economy, and society.
Featured
More Publications and Events
October 20, 2026|Events
Korean Competition Policy and the Stakes for the US-Korea Relationship
Join ITIF for a panel discussion with international experts on a forthcoming report analyzing a decade of previously uncompiled KFTC enforcement data, what its findings mean for U.S.–Korea economic relations, and how policymakers in both countries should respond.
September 30, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Korea Fair Trade Commission Regarding Merger Notification Guidelines
The Proposed Amendment would have the effect of “protecting” startups by frustrating larger firms from acquiring their founders and employees. Adopting such a policy would predictably chill incentives to innovate.
September 28, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Federal Trade Commission Regarding Personalized Pricing
Mandating broader transparency around algorithmic or personalized pricing requires congressional legislation to weigh costs and benefits, and the FTC should revise its policy statement to target law violations without restricting legitimate personalized pricing.
September 15, 2026|Podcasts
Creative Discussion Podcast: Steve Salop on Post-Chicago Antitrust, Raising Rivals’ Costs, and Modern Economic Analysis
Joseph V. Coniglio talks with Georgetown emeritus professor Steven C. Salop about the rise of strategic oligopoly models, the evolving lawyer–economist relationship, and debates over consumer welfare versus broader goals like democracy and inequality.
September 4, 2026|Blogs
Antitrust Overreach Comes for Zillow
Antitrust battles over digital markets have spread well beyond Big Tech to other leading online firms, threatening productivity and dynamism across the digital economy.
September 3, 2026|Blogs
Google’s Spam Policy Change Shows the Costs of DMA Compliance
To avoid a potentially exorbitant Digital Markets Act fine, Google is changing its spam policy in a way that may degrade Search, providing yet another example of the European Commission compelling American firms to weaken their services.
August 31, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Trade Competition Commission of Thailand Regarding Guidelines for Digital Platforms, Wholesale and Retail Businesses, and On-Demand Delivery Services
Thailand’s digital markets exhibit no general market failure that could justify either new ex ante digital antitrust regulation like the PEA or the sort of heavy-handed sector-specific changes to its ex post enforcement framework contemplated by the Proposed Guidelines.
August 31, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the Japan Fair Trade Commission Regarding the Revised “Guidelines to Application of the Antimonopoly Act Concerning Review of Business Combination”
The JFTC has an excellent opportunity to set the global gold standard for competition policy in merger enforcement by issuing guidelines that best foster innovation by fully encouraging the dynamic efficiency benefits that business combinations can bring.
August 28, 2026|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles
AI Companies Are Destroying Books. That's Not Nearly as Scary as It Sounds.
AI companies’ destructive book scanning neither forecloses competition nor threatens humanity’s cultural inheritance. The FTC should not waste resources investigating it.
August 19, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Amicus Brief to the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Regarding Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
It is not necessarily the case that any given iOS user who paid Apple for one or more in-app purchases or for subscription purchases would have been harmed even if Apple had set anticompetitively high commissions.



