Publications: Joe Kane
November 9, 2026
Comments to NTIA Regarding 2027 Internet Use Survey Information Collection
We cannot close the digital divide without identifying its causes and tailoring policy interventions to prioritize its largest causes and wind down policies that address issues that are no longer substantial problems. Therefore, NTIA should tailor and deepen the survey’s ability to track the causes of the digital divide and define the characteristics of broadband that bridges that divide.
October 28, 2026
A US Agenda for World Radiocommunication Conference 27
WRC-27 is an opportunity for the United States to advance global space and spectrum policies that promote productivity and innovation, build support for American priorities, and counter foreign efforts to undermine U.S. leadership in space and terrestrial wireless communications.
October 22, 2026
Pew Lays Broadband’s Cornerstones in the Wrong Place
Pew’s proposed broadband policies put government subsidies and mandates ahead of private investment, competition, and innovation which risks higher costs and worse outcomes for consumers.
October 19, 2026
Reply Comments to the FCC Regarding the Club for Growth’s Petition for an Expedited TCPA Waiver
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) and the Commission seek to protect consumers from unwanted robocalls. The petition would undermine these protections by opening the floodgates to unwanted political robocalls. It would also create an exemption based on the content of the calls.
October 13, 2026
Comments to FCC on Recommendations Approved by the World Radiocommunication Conference Advisor Committee
The benefits of NGSO systems are likely even greater in other countries than they are in the United States. The United States should lead the way to maximize the benefits of NGSOs around the world and bring other countries along with it.
September 14, 2026
Chairman Carr’s Defense of Broadcast Content Regulation Draws Historical Distinctions Without Legal Differences
FCC Chairman Brendan Carr argues that broadcast content regulation is justified by the government’s role in allocating scarce spectrum. But the historical and technical distinctions he draws between broadcasting and other media do not justify subjecting broadcast speech to lesser First Amendment protection.
June 22, 2026
Comments to FCC Regarding Reforming Legacy Rules and Accelerating Network Modernization
The Commission should lean into technological advancements that have made Intercarrier Compensation and the Connect America Fund unnecessary, not delay at the expense of consumers.
June 22, 2026
Comments to FCC Regarding Statutory Equal Opportunities Requirements
Rather than building on the crumbled foundation of the scarcity-rationale cases, the Commission should unwind all content-based regulations within its control, send the signal the Supreme Court invited that the underpinnings of the scarcity rationale are defunct, and decline to defend unconstitutional enforcement actions.
June 4, 2026
Comments to Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Regarding Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Capabilities
NextNav’s proposal for the FCC to unilaterally grant it greater rights at the expense of other users of the 900 MHz band is not in the public interest.
June 3, 2026
New York’s Broadband Report is Driven by Ideology, Not Evidence
New York City’s broadband report cherry-picks outdated data to make the case for government-owned networks, but its own evidence shows competition is strong and affordability challenges require targeted support—not more infrastructure mandates.
