Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

China

Featured

The Hamilton Index, 2026: China’s Dominance in Advanced Industries Is Growing

The Hamilton Index, 2026: China’s Dominance in Advanced Industries Is Growing

China now produces nearly one-quarter of global output in the 10 advanced industries that make up ITIF’s Hamilton Index, outpacing all other nations. America and the West must recognize that China’s gains are coming at the expense of their techno-economic and national power.

Marshaling National Power Industries to Preserve America’s Strength and Thwart China’s Bid for Global Dominance

Marshaling National Power Industries to Preserve America’s Strength and Thwart China’s Bid for Global Dominance

China is on the march to dominate advanced industries that underpin national power in the 21st century. To protect U.S. economic strength and national security, policymakers must jettison old techno-economic and trade policy doctrines and adopt a new national power industry strategy.

China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries

China Is Rapidly Becoming a Leading Innovator in Advanced Industries

There may be no more important question for the West’s competitive position in advanced industries than whether China is becoming a rival innovator. While the evidence suggests it hasn’t yet taken the overall lead, it has pulled ahead in certain areas, and in many others Chinese firms will likely equal or surpass Western firms within a decade or so.

The Hamilton Index, 2023: China Is Running Away With Strategic Industries

The Hamilton Index, 2023: China Is Running Away With Strategic Industries

China now dominates the strategically important industries in ITIF’s Hamilton Index, producing more than any other nation in absolute terms and more than all but a few others in relative terms. Its gains are coming at the expense of the United States and other G7 and OECD economies, and time is running short for policymakers to mount an industrial comeback.

More Publications and Events

May 4, 2026|Reports & Briefings

US Technology Companies Should Keep Operating in China

When U.S. technology companies compete in China, they capture revenue, learn technologies and trends from a critical market, and extend U.S.-built ecosystems. Forcing them out of China would weaken U.S. global competitiveness and give Chinese firms greater scale to shape technology ecosystems.

May 4, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: China Is the Source of 30 Percent of New Innovative Drugs Produced Globally

In 2024, researchers and scientists in China were responsible for developing more than 1,250 new drugs, more than the EU and just slightly less than the United States, which developed 1,440. In total, China developed 30 percent of the world's new innovative drugs.

April 30, 2026|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

China Blocks Tech Acquisitions to Weaken America. The US Shouldn’t Follow Suit.

It is easy to be frustrated with the Chinese government and its use of merger and acquisition controls to limit the competitive advantage of American tech firms. But many policymakers in the West have enabled China’s success by weaponizing antitrust and competition laws to kill pro-competitive deals by Big Tech firms.

April 21, 2026|Blogs

China’s Military Is Cashing in on America’s Open Economy

Chinese firms with ties to Beijing—and in some cases China’s military—are quietly exploiting America’s open economy, taxpayer support, and weak post-acquisition oversight, and Congress should close those loopholes before more U.S. innovation and industrial capacity are used to advance China’s strategic aims.

April 16, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the House Oversight Committee Regarding Artificial Intelligence and American Power

AI is a general-purpose technology with tremendous promise. But U.S. AI leadership and adoption is by no means assured, because there is intense international competition.

April 15, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to USTR Regarding Section 301 Investigations of Certain Economies’ Structural Excess Capacity and Production in Manufacturing Sectors

This Section 301 investigation rightly focuses on structural excess capacity. But its scope encompasses 16 economies rather than narrowly addressing the core cause of global trade upheaval—China’s mercantilism—thereby risking dilution of the blame for the country responsible for causing the need to recalibrate the global system.

April 13, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to the US International Trade Commission Regarding the Economic Impact of Revoking China’s PNTR Status

China should come into full and immediate compliance with its WTO commitments; otherwise, as a last resort, the U.S. government should revoke China’s PNTR status. But policymakers should mitigate second-order effects, particularly on national power industries.

April 6, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: One in Ten Cars Sold in Europe in December 2025 Was Chinese

Sales of Chinese hybrids and plug-in hybrids in Europe increased by a factor of 14 between August 2024 and August 2025

April 6, 2026|Reports & Briefings

The Global Trade Battleground: US-China Competition in the Global South

Countries in the Global South are key markets for Chinese and U.S.-allied national power industries, which require scale economies to flourish. U.S. policymakers should stop viewing them as a “backyard” and recognize that they are a key battlefield in an industrial war.

March 30, 2026|Reports & Briefings

Mobilizing for Techno-Economic War, Part 2: Slowing China’s Advance

Boosting U.S. competitiveness in national power industries is necessary, but not sufficient to avoid losing to China. America also must take measures to slow the PRC’s progress toward global dominance. This report provides more than 100 actionable recommendations for the administration and Congress. Western allies should take many of the same steps.

Back to Top