Testimonies & Filings
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Advising Policymakers
ITIF provides policy expertise to governments around the world, frequently testifying and filing public comments for official hearings, inquiries, and regulatory proceedings.
- Subscribe to our email newsletters and follow us on Twitter to stay abreast.
October 7, 2025
Comments to the FCC Regarding Applications Filed for the Transfer of Cox Enterprises, Inc. to Charter Communications
This merger will be a win for consumers and regulators should not stand in the way.
October 3, 2025
Comments to the European Commission Regarding the European Innovation Act
For the EIA to succeed, the Commission needs to address Europe’s broader economic policy environment. The EU’s reliance on the precautionary principle has entrenched a risk-first mindset that slows innovation and diverts resources away from competition and quality improvement.
October 2, 2025
Comments to the European Commission on the Revision of EU Antitrust Procedures
The antitrust procedural framework can be improved by measures that create a less burdensome and more objective evidentiary process, as well as provide investigated parties with greater access to the Commission’s complete file.
September 24, 2025
Comments to the European Commission for Its First Review of the Digital Markets Act
DMA is not an effective tool of competition policy. On the contrary, it has resulted in demonstrable consumer welfare losses, chilled procompetitive behavior, and even harmed small businesses. What’s more, it has done so by imposing obligations and penalties that inexcusably target America’s leading technology companies.
September 23, 2025
Comments to USTR Regarding the 2025 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy
ITIF recommends that USTR include Temu, AliExpress, and SHEIN on the 2025 Notorious Markets List because all three platforms meet USTR’s criteria as notorious online markets. They facilitate systemic trafficking in counterfeit goods, harming U.S. right holders, undermining fair competition, and placing U.S. consumers at risk.
September 18, 2025
Testimony to the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health Regarding Seniors’ Access to Breakthrough Medical Technologies
Multi-cancer early detection (MCED) technologies are poised to radically transform the cancer-screening paradigm for the significant benefit of Americans’ individual and public health. Congress can play a critical role in making that transformation happen.
September 15, 2025
Letter to the USF Working Group Regarding the Future of the Universal Service Fund
While distribution reform is the best way to shrink the contribution factor, Congress should also reform USF funding to come from general appropriations, or some other method of encompassing the entire U.S. tax base.
September 15, 2025
Comments to the US Justice Department Regarding State Laws Adversely Affecting the Economy or Interstate Commerce
There are many technology policy issues where states have created a patchwork of regulation that impose duplicative costs on businesses, cause confusion for consumers, and act as a drain on the U.S. economy. In order to address these issues, federal preemption would streamline regulation and decrease costs and confusion.
September 8, 2025
Comments to the FCC Regarding Its Inquiry on Deployment of Advanced Telecommunications Capability
The Commission should ground its analysis in consumer experience rather than arbitrary thresholds, and recognize that it is time to recalibrate its priorities to address adoption and affordability barriers that remain the primary drivers of the digital divide.
September 3, 2025
Comments to the European Commission Regarding Mergers Regulation
The focus of the guidelines is to help assess whether a merger would significantly impede effective competition or create or strengthen a dominant position. Unfortunately, this structural understanding of competition differs from a conception of competition as either a dynamic process or a consumer welfare proscription, both of which are far better suited to having a productive and growing economy.