Testimonies & Filings
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Advising Policymakers
ITIF provides policy expertise to governments around the world, frequently testifying and filing public comments for official hearings, inquiries, and regulatory proceedings.
- Subscribe to our email newsletters and follow us on Twitter to stay abreast.
June 13, 2025
Comments to Japan’s Fair Trade Commission Regarding Draft Guidelines for the Mobile Software Competition Economy Act
Although the Draft Guidelines provide guidance for stakeholders as to how the Act will be enforced, they do not adequately ensure that harms to mobile innovation and Japanese consumers will be minimized.
June 6, 2025
Comments to the European Commission Regarding Future Cloud and AI Policies in the EU
It is critical that, in tackling both these issues, the EU avoids engaging in digital protectionism, which would harm European competitiveness further.
June 6, 2025
Comments to the European Commission Regarding Its “Apply AI Strategy”
The Center welcomes the European Commission’s ambition to accelerate the uptake of AI across the economy and public sector as part of its broader AI continent action plan.
May 28, 2025
Comments to OSTP and NITRD on Development of a National Artificial Intelligence R&D Strategic Plan
The Center for Data Innovation urges the U.S. to refocus its federal AI R&D strategy on unlocking AI’s full potential by emphasizing deployment over harm prevention, linking technical design to real-world performance outcomes, and investing in the generation of high-quality, representative data to drive innovation and public benefit.
May 28, 2025
Comments to the Federal Railroad Administration Regarding Modernizing Inspection Requirements
ITIF respectfully urges the FRA to approve the requested relief and to initiate broader regulatory modernization that embraces autonomous safety technologies.
May 27, 2025
Comments to the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division Regarding Anticompetitive Regulations
While targeted rules and regulations which address real market failures and improve the status quo can be defensible, there are many that do not benefit competition or consumers and should likely be rescinded.
May 27, 2025
Comments to the FTC Regarding Anticompetitive Regulations
While targeted rules and regulations which address real market failures and improve the status quo can be defensible, there are many that do not benefit competition or consumers and should likely be rescinded.
May 16, 2025
Amicus Brief Regarding Epic Games v. Apple on Appeal From the US District Court for the Northern District of California
The district court’s Order substantially risks disrupting the iOS ecosystem by sua sponte preventing Apple from exercising its right to charge what it wishes for the use of its platform. That is not behavior that was found to violate California’s UCL and for good reason: above cost pricing is per se lawful and an essential part of the market system upon which the antitrust laws are premised.
May 12, 2025
Comments to OMB Regarding Deregulation
As part of its deregulation efforts, the administration should clarify Bayh-Dole march-in rights; rescind NIH Access Planning Policy; rescind FRA two-person train crew requirements; clarify requirements for manually operated driving controls; protect America’s innovative clean-energy technologies; and streamline regulatory permitting for semiconductors.
May 7, 2025
Comments to the Bureau of Industry and Security Regarding Its Section 232 Investigation of Pharmaceutical Imports
Instead of blanket tariffs, America should focus first on persuading other nations to pay their fair share, and then on supporting public-private investments in novel technologies that will make U.S. pharmaceutical producers more innovative and cost-competitive.