ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Testimonies & Filings

Advising Policymakers

ITIF provides policy expertise to governments around the world, frequently testifying and filing public comments for official hearings, inquiries, and regulatory proceedings.

February 7, 2025

Comments to New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment Regarding Review of the Commerce Act of 1986

While ITIF commends the MBIE for analyzing the efficacy of its current regime, substantial changes to New Zealand’s competition laws should be a response to clear market failures that improves consumer welfare, and not merely an attempt to keep up with perceived global or regional trends.

January 24, 2025

Comments to Standards Australia Regarding Children’s Safety in the Metaverse

Standards Australia should establish age-based guidelines for the metaverse using existing content ratings; require device operating systems to create an opt-in “trustworthy child flag” system; work with global, government-led groups to build voluntary industry standards with a focus on interoperability; and promote digital literacy campaigns for children to operate in the metaverse safely.

January 23, 2025

Comments to the Cyberspace Administration of China Regarding Certification of Personal Information Transferred Abroad

By streamlining compliance costs, clarifying definitions, and easing the extraterritorial scope of the legislation, the Cyberspace Administration of China can foster a more business-friendly environment while still ensuring data security for personal information.

January 17, 2025

Comments to the European Commission Regarding Proposed Measures for Interoperability Between Apple iOS and Devices

Instead of treating Apple as a public utility, the Commission should work to ensure that interoperability requirements align with the broader theoretical framework that orients European competition policy, such as condemning unilateral conduct that may harm rivals only when it does not constitute competition on the merits.

January 10, 2025

Opposition to Petitions to Deny Applications of T-Mobile and US Cellular For Consent To Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations

Consumers would benefit directly from more capable spectrum use and commercial offerings, and the home and mobile broadband markets would benefit from a more capable competitor.

January 7, 2025

Comments to the Departments of Justice and Transportation Regarding Competition in Air Transportation

Populists argue mergers reduced robust competition that travelers previously enjoyed, allowing the remaining “Big Four” carriers to cut capacity, decrease service quality and raise prices. But that narrative could not be more wrong.

January 6, 2025

Amicus Brief Regarding TikTok, Inc. v. Garland

Banning Americans from accessing a social media application that millions use every day is unprecedented in our country. If the such a ban goes into effect, it will cause a far-reaching disruption in Americans’ ability to engage with the content and audiences of their choice online.

January 6, 2025

Comments to UK Home Office’s Consultation on the Codes of Practice for the Investigatory Powers (Amendment) Act 2024

The IPA has garnered significant attention from a host of tech companies due to new requirements to notify the Secretary of State of “relevant changes” to their systems that could potentially impede government access.

December 31, 2024

Response to the Electronic Transactions Development Agency’s Consultation Regarding Digital Markets and Competition

Thailand’s emerging digital markets are driven by innovation, growth, and the spirit of entrepreneurship. Hastily adopting the PEA as proposed risks introducing unnecessary regulatory burdens, fostering regulatory capture, and stifling innovation without clear evidence of market failure.

December 18, 2024

Comments to the US International Trade Commission Regarding Active Matrix OLED Display Panels

Section 337 was made into law to help address unfair foreign trade practices. It should be used vigorously to prevent the import of IP-infringing products from firms that systemically benefit from unfair government practices in non-market, non-rule-of-law economies such as China.

Back to Top