Get the FCC Out of the Censorship Business
FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr has invoked the “public interest” standard to threaten broadcasters who air political commentary he dislikes—most recently Jimmy Kimmel’s remarks about Charlie Kirk. But as Joe Kane argues in City Journal, Carr’s approach misrepresents the law and endangers free speech.
Kane explains that while the FCC regulates broadcasters’ technical operations, it cannot use license renewals to punish political expression. The Supreme Court has repeatedly limited the “public interest” standard, and any attempt to weaponize it for partisan ends would violate both the Communications Act and the First Amendment.
Carr’s threats, Kane warns, reflect a broader misunderstanding of the FCC’s authority. Congress never gave the Commission power to police speech—and doing so would set a dangerous precedent for government censorship of political discourse.
Related
September 19, 2025
The FCC Has No Mandate to Police Speech in the ‘Public Interest’
February 11, 2025
Expression Over Radio Waves Is Not Exempt From the First Amendment
December 12, 2014