US Trails Germany in States’ “Innovation Competitiveness,” Despite Mass., Calif. Ranking 1, 2 in New Transatlantic Index
WASHINGTON—Competitiveness in the global economy hinges on innovation, and on that score the median German state is outpacing the median U.S. state, according to a new ranking produced by the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) in collaboration with the German Economic Institute (IW), the Institute for Competitiveness (I-Com) in Italy, and the Macdonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) in Canada.
The new “Transatlantic Subnational Innovation Competitiveness Index” examines the innovation ecosystems of 96 states, provinces, and subnational regions across the United States, Canada, Germany, and Italy using 13 indicators of competitive strength in 3 categories—the knowledge economy, globalization, and innovation capacity.
Massachusetts and California stand first and second in the ranking, and Washington State is in the top five, but the median German state outperforms the median U.S. state. Meanwhile, Italy’s median region edges Canada’s median province.
“Governments at all levels are waking up to the fact nations, states, and municipalities need innovation strategies to compete in a global economy that is increasingly driven by knowledge, technology, and innovation,” said Stephen Ezell, vice president of global innovation policy at ITIF, who co-authored the report. “For any developed economy, competitiveness hinges on having a vibrant innovation ecosystem, because innovation drives productivity, growth, and capital investments.”
The index assesses North American and European states’ relative strength on 13 economic indicators divided into three categories:
1. Knowledge economy, with indicators encompassing immigration of knowledge workers; workforce education; professional, scientific, and technical employment; and manufacturing gross value added per worker.
2. Globalization, including inward foreign direct investment and high-tech exports.
3. Innovation capacity, with indicators covering broadband Internet adoption, R&D expenditures, R&D personnel, patents, business creation, decarbonization, and venture capital investment.
Among the study’s findings:
▪ Overall, out of the 96 states represented in the four-country ranking, the top five are: Massachusetts, California, Baden-Württemberg, Berlin, and Washington. The bottom five overall are: Apulia, West Virginia, Sicily, Calabria, and Mississippi.
▪ In the knowledge economy category, the top five states are: Berlin, Hamburg, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Maryland. The bottom five are: Newfoundland and Labrador, Apulia, Mississippi, Calabria, and Sicily.
▪ U.S. states outperform their peers in higher-education attainment, with Massachusetts, Colorado, and New Jersey holding the top three rankings, and in manufacturing labor productivity, where Louisiana, Wyoming, and California are ranked first, second, and third. Canada attracts the most skilled immigrant workers, on average; and Germany exhibits strength in scientific, technical, and professional employment.
▪ In the globalization category, the top five states are: Lombardy, Bavaria, Ontario, Baden-Württemberg, and Hesse. The bottom five are: Saskatchewan, Molise, Montana, Hawaii, Calabria.
▪ Canadian provinces lead in inward foreign direct investment, followed by U.S. states, while German and Italian states produce greater levels of high-tech exports relative to the size of their regional economies.
▪ In the innovation capacity category, the top five states are: Baden-Württemberg, Massachusetts, Washington, California, and Berlin. The bottom five are: South Dakota, Mississippi, Alaska, Louisiana, and West Virginia.
▪ Germany and the United States have clear leadership in research and development (R&D) intensity—with New Mexico, Washington, Massachusetts, and California holding the top four rankings—and in venture capital, where California and Massachusetts are ranked one and two.
The report provides a series of policy recommendations to bolster the innovation competitiveness of enterprises and industries in regional economies. Among the recommendations for federal and state policymakers in the United States, the report advises:
▪ Promote industry-university partnerships that support both R&D and STEM education.
▪ Focus on accelerating international collaborations.
▪ Implement a free trade agreement with the United Kingdom.
▪ Advance high-standard digital trade rules that enable global data flows and limit barriers to cross-border data flows, such as data localization policies.
▪ Ensure the U.S.-Canada-Mexico free trade agreement partners fully adhere to the new stronger digital trade rules.
▪ Fully appropriate the R&D funding elements of the CHIPS and Science Act to follow through with a landmark investment in U.S. innovation and competitiveness.
▪ Increase R&D tax credit generosity.
▪ Use federal investment to build up economic attractiveness for underperforming states.
“Policymakers should take account of unique regional challenges and opportunities to craft region-specific approaches to bolster innovation competitiveness,” said Ezell. “But there are no shortcuts. All of the foundational areas this index examines are important.”
Table 1: The Transatlantic Subnational Innovation Competitiveness Index: Rankings and Scores
Overall |
Region |
Country |
Overall |
Knowledge |
Globalization |
Capacity |
|||
Rank |
Score |
Rank |
Score |
Rank |
Score |
||||
1 |
Massachusetts |
USA |
95.1 |
3 |
87.4 |
12 |
70.7 |
2 |
93.2 |
2 |
California |
USA |
86.9 |
6 |
77.4 |
42 |
43.0 |
4 |
91.6 |
3 |
Baden-Württemberg |
DEU |
84.9 |
19 |
54.4 |
4 |
83.1 |
1 |
95.2 |
4 |
Berlin |
DEU |
80.3 |
1 |
95.1 |
46 |
40.5 |
5 |
78.2 |
5 |
Washington |
USA |
80.1 |
14 |
61.6 |
68 |
29.9 |
3 |
92.6 |
6 |
Hamburg |
DEU |
73.5 |
2 |
93.5 |
13 |
69.4 |
10 |
62.2 |
7 |
Bavaria |
DEU |
71.6 |
20 |
53.6 |
2 |
90.4 |
6 |
74.6 |
8 |
Hesse |
DEU |
66.1 |
15 |
61.6 |
5 |
81.2 |
8 |
63.6 |
9 |
Maryland |
USA |
62.8 |
5 |
77.4 |
64 |
31.3 |
12 |
59.6 |
10 |
Bremen |
DEU |
58.9 |
10 |
64.5 |
47 |
40.2 |
11 |
60.5 |
11 |
New Jersey |
USA |
57.9 |
4 |
82.3 |
80 |
23.5 |
19 |
50.5 |
12 |
Oregon |
USA |
57.9 |
30 |
46.1 |
33 |
49.9 |
7 |
65.4 |
13 |
Connecticut |
USA |
54.7 |
9 |
65.4 |
24 |
56.5 |
22 |
47.6 |
14 |
Colorado |
USA |
53.9 |
12 |
62.3 |
21 |
60.8 |
20 |
49.3 |
15 |
Delaware |
USA |
53.0 |
21 |
52.4 |
36 |
48.3 |
15 |
56.4 |
16 |
Ontario |
CAN |
51.9 |
8 |
65.4 |
3 |
86.5 |
35 |
40.3 |
17 |
Emilia-Romagna |
ITA |
50.2 |
48 |
35.1 |
9 |
74.2 |
14 |
56.5 |
18 |
New Hampshire |
USA |
49.9 |
39 |
40.5 |
18 |
66.3 |
16 |
54.1 |
19 |
Michigan |
USA |
49.0 |
37 |
40.9 |
59 |
34.5 |
13 |
57.4 |
20 |
North Rhine-Westphalia |
DEU |
48.6 |
27 |
47.1 |
19 |
63.5 |
21 |
49.2 |
21 |
Minnesota |
USA |
48.6 |
23 |
50.9 |
40 |
43.9 |
18 |
51.1 |
22 |
Utah |
USA |
48.1 |
31 |
46.0 |
38 |
47.1 |
17 |
51.9 |
23 |
New York |
USA |
47.7 |
16 |
60.1 |
35 |
48.6 |
31 |
41.2 |
24 |
New Mexico |
USA |
47.2 |
51 |
33.6 |
70 |
27.4 |
9 |
63.1 |
25 |
Virginia |
USA |
46.1 |
7 |
75.2 |
32 |
50.1 |
53 |
32.4 |
26 |
Illinois |
USA |
45.7 |
18 |
58.3 |
22 |
58.4 |
37 |
40.0 |
27 |
Texas |
USA |
45.6 |
13 |
62.1 |
15 |
68.3 |
50 |
33.3 |
28 |
Lombardy |
ITA |
44.9 |
35 |
41.8 |
1 |
94.8 |
33 |
40.8 |
29 |
Lower Saxony |
DEU |
44.6 |
33 |
42.7 |
39 |
44.9 |
23 |
47.1 |
30 |
British Columbia |
CAN |
44.3 |
17 |
58.8 |
17 |
66.7 |
45 |
36.1 |
31 |
Rhineland-Palatinate |
DEU |
43.7 |
41 |
40.0 |
31 |
50.4 |
24 |
46.6 |
32 |
Saxony |
DEU |
43.3 |
40 |
40.4 |
23 |
56.6 |
28 |
43.6 |
33 |
Saarland |
DEU |
42.1 |
46 |
36.0 |
14 |
69.4 |
26 |
44.2 |
34 |
Quebec |
CAN |
40.6 |
28 |
46.8 |
28 |
52.8 |
36 |
40.2 |
35 |
Piedmont |
ITA |
40.0 |
63 |
29.4 |
6 |
78.2 |
27 |
43.7 |
36 |
Lazio |
ITA |
39.9 |
29 |
46.2 |
44 |
42.9 |
30 |
41.6 |
37 |
North Carolina |
USA |
39.6 |
24 |
50.7 |
82 |
20.8 |
40 |
39.2 |
38 |
Pennsylvania |
USA |
39.1 |
26 |
47.2 |
52 |
37.9 |
42 |
37.6 |
39 |
Friuli-Venezia Giulia |
ITA |
38.2 |
69 |
27.2 |
11 |
71.1 |
29 |
43.2 |
40 |
Arizona |
USA |
37.5 |
38 |
40.8 |
48 |
39.8 |
39 |
39.4 |
41 |
Thuringia |
DEU |
37.1 |
49 |
34.2 |
30 |
50.8 |
41 |
38.7 |
42 |
Idaho |
USA |
36.1 |
74 |
24.6 |
54 |
36.6 |
25 |
46.5 |
43 |
Missouri |
USA |
35.6 |
47 |
35.7 |
8 |
74.5 |
52 |
32.6 |
44 |
Wisconsin |
USA |
35.5 |
61 |
29.4 |
25 |
56.3 |
38 |
39.8 |
45 |
Rhode Island |
USA |
34.9 |
43 |
38.0 |
37 |
48.1 |
46 |
35.6 |
46 |
Alberta |
CAN |
34.6 |
11 |
64.4 |
51 |
38.6 |
64 |
24.1 |
47 |
Veneto |
ITA |
34.4 |
73 |
24.7 |
20 |
62.1 |
34 |
40.5 |
48 |
Schleswig-Holstein |
DEU |
33.4 |
50 |
34.2 |
43 |
42.9 |
47 |
35.0 |
49 |
Ohio |
USA |
32.8 |
45 |
37.6 |
55 |
36.6 |
48 |
33.9 |
50 |
Tuscany |
ITA |
32.2 |
71 |
26.7 |
49 |
39.7 |
32 |
40.8 |
51 |
Indiana |
USA |
30.0 |
55 |
32.0 |
75 |
24.9 |
44 |
36.6 |
52 |
Liguria |
ITA |
29.8 |
59 |
30.3 |
34 |
48.9 |
49 |
33.6 |
53 |
Mecklenburg-Vorpommern |
DEU |
29.8 |
56 |
31.7 |
62 |
32.5 |
56 |
30.4 |
54 |
Kansas |
USA |
29.1 |
36 |
41.4 |
65 |
31.1 |
61 |
27.5 |
55 |
Georgia |
USA |
28.3 |
34 |
42.3 |
79 |
23.7 |
59 |
28.0 |
56 |
Florida |
USA |
27.3 |
32 |
43.3 |
81 |
23.0 |
63 |
24.3 |
57 |
Marche |
ITA |
26.2 |
85 |
19.2 |
63 |
32.2 |
43 |
37.2 |
58 |
Abruzzo |
ITA |
25.6 |
77 |
23.6 |
27 |
53.6 |
58 |
29.7 |
59 |
Maine |
USA |
25.3 |
64 |
29.1 |
7 |
75.5 |
84 |
19.6 |
60 |
Vermont |
USA |
25.1 |
58 |
30.5 |
16 |
67.5 |
76 |
21.3 |
61 |
Wyoming |
USA |
25.0 |
25 |
48.7 |
86 |
16.0 |
83 |
19.8 |
62 |
Brandenburg |
DEU |
24.7 |
42 |
39.4 |
85 |
16.0 |
60 |
27.7 |
63 |
Trentino |
ITA |
24.3 |
53 |
32.4 |
57 |
35.3 |
51 |
32.8 |
64 |
Umbria |
ITA |
23.8 |
76 |
23.7 |
66 |
30.6 |
54 |
31.6 |
65 |
Saxony-Anhalt |
DEU |
23.1 |
60 |
29.8 |
77 |
24.9 |
79 |
20.2 |
66 |
Iowa |
USA |
22.6 |
68 |
27.3 |
83 |
19.9 |
57 |
30.4 |
67 |
Tennessee |
USA |
22.2 |
52 |
32.9 |
72 |
27.1 |
70 |
22.6 |
68 |
Nebraska |
USA |
22.0 |
44 |
38.0 |
74 |
25.5 |
80 |
20.1 |
69 |
Kentucky |
USA |
21.5 |
78 |
23.3 |
10 |
71.9 |
85 |
18.2 |
70 |
Nevada |
USA |
21.1 |
70 |
27.2 |
67 |
30.6 |
69 |
22.7 |
71 |
Prince Edward Island |
CAN |
21.1 |
81 |
21.5 |
26 |
56.3 |
67 |
23.0 |
72 |
Manitoba |
CAN |
21.0 |
57 |
31.0 |
53 |
37.3 |
72 |
21.8 |
73 |
Nova Scotia |
CAN |
21.0 |
65 |
28.9 |
50 |
38.9 |
68 |
22.7 |
74 |
North Dakota |
USA |
18.8 |
72 |
26.1 |
69 |
29.6 |
75 |
21.6 |
75 |
South Carolina |
USA |
18.2 |
67 |
28.1 |
78 |
23.9 |
74 |
21.7 |
76 |
Campania |
ITA |
17.5 |
90 |
12.5 |
84 |
17.8 |
55 |
31.2 |
77 |
Louisiana |
USA |
17.3 |
22 |
52.2 |
87 |
15.6 |
95 |
8.6 |
78 |
Alabama |
USA |
16.3 |
75 |
24.0 |
91 |
13.3 |
65 |
23.4 |
79 |
Aosta Valley |
ITA |
15.4 |
84 |
19.2 |
76 |
24.9 |
71 |
22.4 |
80 |
Montana |
USA |
15.2 |
54 |
32.0 |
94 |
9.4 |
87 |
17.2 |
81 |
Basilicata |
ITA |
15.1 |
87 |
16.3 |
41 |
43.2 |
78 |
20.3 |
82 |
Oklahoma |
USA |
14.9 |
79 |
23.0 |
58 |
35.1 |
86 |
17.5 |
83 |
New Brunswick |
CAN |
14.4 |
80 |
22.9 |
60 |
32.8 |
88 |
17.0 |
84 |
Newfoundland and Labrador |
CAN |
13.7 |
92 |
12.1 |
61 |
32.5 |
73 |
21.8 |
85 |
Hawaii |
USA |
13.4 |
66 |
28.3 |
95 |
8.9 |
90 |
15.0 |
86 |
Molise |
ITA |
13.2 |
91 |
12.4 |
93 |
13.0 |
62 |
25.8 |
87 |
Saskatchewan |
CAN |
12.8 |
62 |
29.4 |
92 |
13.1 |
89 |
15.2 |
88 |
Sardinia |
ITA |
12.2 |
89 |
12.8 |
90 |
14.6 |
66 |
23.1 |
89 |
South Dakota |
USA |
11.9 |
88 |
16.1 |
45 |
40.8 |
92 |
13.4 |
90 |
Alaska |
USA |
11.6 |
82 |
20.4 |
73 |
26.5 |
94 |
11.3 |
91 |
Arkansas |
USA |
9.0 |
86 |
17.3 |
71 |
27.2 |
91 |
14.2 |
92 |
Apulia |
ITA |
8.6 |
93 |
7.7 |
88 |
14.9 |
77 |
20.8 |
93 |
West Virginia |
USA |
8.2 |
83 |
19.3 |
29 |
51.5 |
96 |
4.8 |
94 |
Sicily |
ITA |
7.0 |
96 |
4.9 |
89 |
14.8 |
81 |
20.0 |
95 |
Calabria |
ITA |
5.8 |
95 |
5.2 |
96 |
5.2 |
82 |
20.0 |
96 |
Mississippi |
USA |
4.9 |
94 |
6.2 |
56 |
36.0 |
93 |
11.4 |
30 |
Median German state |
44.1 |
37 |
41.5 |
31 |
50.6 |
24 |
46.9 |
|
47 |
Median U.S. state |
33.8 |
41 |
39.3 |
56 |
36.3 |
51 |
32.9 |
|
61 |
Median Italian region |
24.9 |
77 |
23.7 |
53 |
37.5 |
53 |
32.2 |
|
72 |
Median Canadian province |
21.1 |
60 |
30.2 |
51 |
38.8 |
68 |
22.8 |
|
28 |
Average German state |
50.4 |
32 |
49.9 |
34 |
53.5 |
28 |
51.1 |
|
47 |
Average U.S. state |
35.6 |
44 |
41.9 |
53 |
39.3 |
51 |
36.1 |
|
60 |
Average Canadian province |
27.5 |
50 |
38.1 |
44 |
45.6 |
64 |
26.2 |
|
62 |
Average Italian region |
25.2 |
73 |
22.6 |
52 |
40.6 |
51 |
32.8 |
▪ Explore a data visualization.
▪ Download the data. (XLSX)
###
The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is an independent, nonprofit, nonpartisan research and educational institute focusing on the intersection of technological innovation and public policy. Recognized by its peers in the think tank community as the global center of excellence for science and technology policy, ITIF’s mission is to formulate and promote policy solutions that accelerate innovation and boost productivity to spur growth, opportunity, and progress.