Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Federal Strategy and Management

ITIF formulates and promotes national strategies and and programmatic recommendations to align federal agencies and operations to meet the opportunities and challenges of innovation-driven growth and global competitiveness.

Robert D. Atkinson
Robert D. Atkinson

Senior Fellow

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Stephen Ezell
Stephen Ezell

Executive Vice President, Global Innovation Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

Computer Chips vs. Potato Chips: The Case for a U.S. Strategic-Industry Policy

Computer Chips vs. Potato Chips: The Case for a U.S. Strategic-Industry Policy

With the rise of China, the United States needs more than a competitiveness strategy; it needs a policy specifically tailored to boost production and innovation capacity in strategically important industries—especially technologically sophisticated ones with dual-use capabilities.

Why the United States Needs a National Advanced Industry and Technology Agency

Why the United States Needs a National Advanced Industry and Technology Agency

With the rise of China, the U.S. economic and technology environment has fundamentally and inexorably changed. The most important step Congress and the Biden administration can take to meet the challenge is to create a dedicated national advanced industry and technology agency.

Think Like an Enterprise: Why Nations Need Comprehensive Productivity Strategies

Think Like an Enterprise: Why Nations Need Comprehensive Productivity Strategies

Productivity is the key to improving living standards—so policymakers should ignore conventional economists who say there is little government can do about it and instead make it the principal goal of economic policy.

More Publications and Events

November 5, 2026|Blogs

Better Federal Statistics Are Needed to Understand AI's Impact on Work

Policymakers lack the comprehensive data needed to understand how AI is affecting employment, wages, productivity, and the tasks workers perform. To close these gaps, federal statistical agencies should improve AI-related data collection, link technology adoption to employment outcomes, and make better use of private-sector data

October 26, 2026|Reports & Briefings

Mobilizing for Techno-Economic War, Part 8: Establishing Policy and Programmatic Capabilities

The U.S. government lacks adequate capabilities to conduct the kind of techno-economic industrial analysis that is necessary to avoid losing to China, nor is it organized to formulate and manage industrial and competitiveness strategies, policies, and programs in an enterprise-wide way. Policymakers must address these gaps to mobilize America’s economic power industries.

October 25, 2026|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

A Tech Hub for Every Region? The Test Facing South Korea

Assigning an advanced industry to every region will not, by itself, create successful tech hubs. Korea should concentrate resources in promising clusters, revise funding as private investment and customer demand emerge, and improve daily life in waning communities.

August 10, 2026|Blogs

The US Science System Needs Reform, Not Arbitrary Funding Cuts

Arbitrary funding cuts and increased political involvement in grantmaking will further weaken an already less productive U.S. science system. Policymakers should pursue reforms that enable researchers to generate more breakthroughs and strengthen U.S. competitiveness.

July 7, 2026|Op-Eds & Contributed Articles

Is the West Better Than China?

If the China challenge is real, the West needs to get serious about its techno-industrial policy. This means a more active state in tech, trade, and industry, a prospect certain to rile free-market advocates who imagine that “even if the US is a hollowed-out economy, at least we will be free.”

April 28, 2026|Blogs

The Hard Choices Facing Canada’s Next Competition Commissioner

Ottawa is choosing its next Competition Commissioner, who will decide if firms are allowed to get big by competing or punished for trying. Canada needs competition policy that protects consumers without treating scale, investment, or ambition as suspect.

April 2, 2026|Blogs

“Made in USA” Claims Need Better Data, Not More Liability

While false “Made in USA” claims are a real problem, the solution is not holding online marketplaces liable but strengthening data infrastructure and verification systems that enable regulators, consumers, and AI tools to more effectively identify and enforce legitimate claims.

April 1, 2026|Reports & Briefings

Reforming Canada Post for a Lower-Volume Era

Canada Post’s cost structure no longer scales in a low-volume world. Labour flexibility, automation, work sharing, retail consolidation, and parcel growth are necessary to reduce the cost of reaching every address while preserving universal service.

December 19, 2025|Blogs

Export Controls Should Advance US Semiconductor Leadership

U.S. semiconductor export controls swing unpredictably between administrations, undermining innovation and security. The solution is a clear, bipartisan strategy that narrowly restricts the most sensitive technologies while allowing U.S. chipmakers to compete globally.

December 15, 2025|Events

Crafting a National Power Industry Strategy in Response to China’s Industrial War

Watch now for expert panel discussion on an important new report that outlines China’s goals and strategy, explains why this moment marks a historical turning point, and defines the nature and importance of national power industries. Panelists discussed flaws in prevailing China policy frameworks and explore why the field of corporate strategy should guide the creation of a coherent National Power Industry Strategy.

Back to Top