Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Federal Strategy and Management

ITIF formulates and promotes national strategies and and programmatic recommendations to align federal agencies and operations to meet the opportunities and challenges of innovation-driven growth and global competitiveness.

Robert D. Atkinson
Robert D. Atkinson

President

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Stephen Ezell
Stephen Ezell

Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, and Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

Computer Chips vs. Potato Chips: The Case for a U.S. Strategic-Industry Policy

Computer Chips vs. Potato Chips: The Case for a U.S. Strategic-Industry Policy

With the rise of China, the United States needs more than a competitiveness strategy; it needs a policy specifically tailored to boost production and innovation capacity in strategically important industries—especially technologically sophisticated ones with dual-use capabilities.

Why the United States Needs a National Advanced Industry and Technology Agency

Why the United States Needs a National Advanced Industry and Technology Agency

With the rise of China, the U.S. economic and technology environment has fundamentally and inexorably changed. The most important step Congress and the Biden administration can take to meet the challenge is to create a dedicated national advanced industry and technology agency.

Think Like an Enterprise: Why Nations Need Comprehensive Productivity Strategies

Think Like an Enterprise: Why Nations Need Comprehensive Productivity Strategies

Productivity is the key to improving living standards—so policymakers should ignore conventional economists who say there is little government can do about it and instead make it the principal goal of economic policy.

More Publications and Events

August 28, 2025|Blogs

Don’t Let Washington Turn Tech Companies Into Amtrak

The Trump administration doubled down on its push for the federal government to take financial stakes or other commercial interests in major U.S. companies—a policy that would weaken American competitiveness, invite political manipulation, and undermine the very goals of U.S. industrial strategy.

August 21, 2025|Blogs

The Trump Administration Should Refrain From Taking Equity in Semiconductor Companies

Turning CHIPS Act grants into government equity stakes would undermine their purpose and weaken U.S. efforts to expand domestic semiconductor manufacturing.

August 11, 2025|Blogs

Closing the Gaps in the Strengthening Cyber Resilience Act

The Strengthening Cyber Resilience Against State-Sponsored Threats Act is a timely and necessary response to the growing threat posed by state-sponsored cyber actors, particularly from China, but Congress should further refine it to truly future-proof the nation’s cybersecurity posture.

July 29, 2025|Blogs

Hardening US Infrastructure Before a Potential Iranian Cyber Attack

Iran’s growing cyber capabilities, combined with recent geopolitical tensions, pose a serious threat to U.S. critical infrastructure, requiring urgent federal action to strengthen digital defenses and build long-term resilience.

July 7, 2025|Blogs

Canada Doesn’t Have an Innovation System: It Has 134 Programs

Canada needs a new federal institution that makes its innovation system more than the sum of its parts: a Canadian Innovation and Industrial Transformation Agency. This institution wouldn’t replace programs. It would govern them coherently, strategically, and at speed.

June 17, 2025|Blogs

Fixing America’s Quality Crisis Starts With Reforming the Baldrige Award

Tariffs and tax breaks won’t fix America’s quality crisis. But perhaps an overhaul of the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award will.

June 10, 2025|Blogs

Federal Lights on for Lights-Out Factories

It’s time to think big and bold. The United States should pursue a super-automation moonshot by establishing 50 to 100 demonstration factories that deploy state-of-the-art automation technologies.

May 30, 2025|Blogs

Serious About Shrinking Government? Cut the SBA

Assuming the Trump administration is serious about shrinking government, why not eliminate an agency whose sole purpose is to distort market outcomes by privileging firm size over performance and productivity? When it comes to government waste, the Small Business Administration is low-hanging fruit that has been over-ripe for a long time.

May 29, 2025|Blogs

Fuel for Thought: A New Mechanism to Fund Canadian Innovation

Canada stands at a pivotal moment to leverage its natural resource boom into long-term industrial strength by tying faster permitting and land access to reinvestment in innovation. A modest levy on resource extraction could fund a new federal agency focused on turning Canadian R&D into real production and globally competitive advanced industries.

April 24, 2025|Blogs

USPS Needs Innovation—Not a White House Takeover

President Trump’s proposal to move USPS under the Department of Commerce would politicize an independent institution, risking service disruptions and unfair pricing. Instead, USPS needs innovation-focused reforms that boost efficiency, strengthen public-private collaboration, and maintain its universal service mission without political interference.

Back to Top