Broadband Access and Regulation
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
ITIF supports policies that encourage private investment in broadband infrastructure, improve affordability and digital inclusion, and enhance the development of all broadband technologies, including fiber, cable, terrestrial wireless, and satellite. We advocate for light-touch regulation to sustain innovation, support mergers that deliver consumer benefits, and ensure a level playing field for private ISPs and American content companies.

Policy Analyst, Broadband, Spectrum, and Space Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
BEAD Needs All Technologies to Succeed

The administration should reform the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment (BEAD) program to stop favoring overly expensive fiber when LEO satellites could do the same job for less. Taking a technology-neutral approach to broadband deployment would save money that could be better spent on other causes of the digital divide.
More Publications and Events
September 24, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Reply Comments to FCC Regarding Reliable Access to Spectrum for Space Launch Activities
Spectrum is a critical component for space launch, and frequency coordinators play a vital role in balancing the spectrum needs of the aviation and the space sectors, both of which are essential for American technological leadership.
September 17, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to FCC Regarding Build America: Eliminating Barriers to Wireline Deployments
The Commission should establish predictable federal guardrails to address wireline deployment barriers while preserving legitimate state and local ROW-management functions. These measures would give providers and governments clearer expectations and reduce some regulatory uncertainty surrounding deployments that require state or local authorization.
August 4, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to FCC Regarding Reforming the High-Cost Program For an All-IP Future
Phasing out legacy High-Cost mechanisms, allowing time-limited deployment programs to sunset as scheduled, and establishing a leaner USF focused on broadband affordability and adoption would better serve consumers, strengthen competition, and improve stewardship of USF resources.
July 21, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to FCC Regarding Assignment and Transfer of Control of Licenses and Authorizations Held by Globalstar to Amazon
The Commission should approve this transaction because it will serve the public interest by increasing spectrum productivity, increasing competition in the emerging D2D marketplace, and extending mobile communications coverage to remote and underserved areas.
July 7, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the FCC Regarding AT&T’s Petition for Preemption and Declaratory Ruling on California’s Carrier of Last Resort and Related Requirements
The Commission should thoughtfully consider AT&T’s petition because it could catalyze the retirement of outdated copper networks, accelerate network modernization, and advance the transition to a modern, all-IP communications ecosystem.
June 22, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to FCC Regarding Reforming Legacy Rules and Accelerating Network Modernization
The Commission should lean into technological advancements that have made Intercarrier Compensation and the Connect America Fund unnecessary, not delay at the expense of consumers.
June 22, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to FCC Regarding Statutory Equal Opportunities Requirements
Rather than building on the crumbled foundation of the scarcity-rationale cases, the Commission should unwind all content-based regulations within its control, send the signal the Supreme Court invited that the underpinnings of the scarcity rationale are defunct, and decline to defend unconstitutional enforcement actions.
June 16, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to the California Public Utilities Commission Regarding Carrier of Last Resort Requirements
At a time of unprecedented growth in the broadband market, California’s broadband laws remain unchanged, and it is costing consumers faster, more reliable Internet.
June 4, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Regarding Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Capabilities
NextNav’s proposal for the FCC to unilaterally grant it greater rights at the expense of other users of the 900 MHz band is not in the public interest.
June 3, 2026|Blogs
New York’s Broadband Report is Driven by Ideology, Not Evidence
New York City’s broadband report cherry-picks outdated data to make the case for government-owned networks, but its own evidence shows competition is strong and affordability challenges require targeted support—not more infrastructure mandates.





