Biopharmaceutical Innovation
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
The world is entering a promising golden age of life sciences innovation, with potentially enormous benefits for human health, productivity, and sustainability. But that vision is at risk from a host of forces that seek to hamper the fundamental business models that have enabled such innovation. ITIF’s Center for Life Sciences Innovation exists to fight back against such forces, while documenting the importance of life science innovation and the private-sector led model complemented by government support that has been so successful elevate. We conduct research, generate policy proposals, and convene members of the analytical and policymaking communities with this mission firmly in focus.

Associate Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read Bio
Vice President, Global Innovation Policy, and Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read Bio
Policy Intern, Center for Life Sciences Innovation
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
Evidence to Inform Biopharmaceutical Policy: A Call for Research on the Impact of Public Policies on Investment in Drug Development

The scope and magnitude of the trade-off between immediate savings from lower drug prices and future health benefits from clinical development remain poorly understood and quantified. To support rigorous evaluations and inform evidence-based policymaking, it is crucial to invest in this area through research grants and improved access to federal and private data.
Evidence-Based Biopharmaceutical Policymaking: Symposium Report

There is a need for more rigorous evidence and more recent, high-quality data to inform biopharmaceutical policymaking by shedding light on the relationship between pharmaceutical firms’ expectations of financial returns from new drugs and their ability to invest in further R&D to discover future generations of drugs.
More Publications and Events
May 12, 2026|Events
Lessons From Europe’s Loss of Biopharma Leadership, and Its Attempts to Recover
Please join ITIF for an expert panel discussion on what Europe’s experience reveals about the risks of undermining biopharmaceutical innovation, how policy choices shape R&D investment and competitiveness, and what steps U.S. policymakers should take to sustain American leadership in life sciences.
May 4, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: China Is the Source of 30 Percent of New Innovative Drugs Produced Globally
In 2024, researchers and scientists in China were responsible for developing more than 1,250 new drugs, more than the EU and just slightly less than the United States, which developed 1,440. In total, China developed 30 percent of the world's new innovative drugs.
April 20, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: Researchers on the International Space Station Have Produced 4,000 Research Papers Since 2000
Over the past 26 years, researchers on the International Space Station have produced roughly 4,000 research papers and have helped to develop treatments for several diseases, including cancer, Alzheimer’s, and heart disease.
April 9, 2026|Blogs
America's Living Library Act Would Expand Access to Nature's Drug Discovery Potential
America’s Living Library Act would turn U.S. biodiversity into a strategic innovation asset by fueling AI-enabled drug discovery, strengthening biopharma R&D, and helping America stay ahead in the global biotech race.
April 3, 2026|Blogs
Trump Pharma Tariffs: Wrong Rx for U.S. Patients, Manufacturing, and Innovation
The Trump administration’s Section 232 pharmaceutical tariffs will needlessly raise drug costs, harm U.S. patients, and undermine both domestic manufacturing and global biopharmaceutical innovation, while better policy options exist to strengthen the industry without these damaging side effects.
March 18, 2026|Reports & Briefings
Lessons From Europe’s Loss of Biopharma Leadership, and Its Attempts to Recover
Europe once led the world in biopharmaceutical innovation, but it lost ground after adopting policies that weakened incentives for R&D and innovation. America must learn from Europe’s experience to preserve its own biopharma leadership and the related economic benefits and access to the most innovative drugs.
March 16, 2026|Reports & Briefings
Leveraging Innovation to Improve Alzheimer’s Diagnosis and Care in Rural America
Rural communities face structural barriers to diagnosing Alzheimer’s early, which increases burdens on patients and caregivers while raising health-care costs. Policymakers should address the problem by expanding provider training and accelerating scalable diagnostic technologies.
March 9, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: Productivity in the Pharmaceutical and Medicine Industry Fell by 2.4 Percent Annually Between 2014 and 2024
The pharmaceutical and medicine industry has seen its productivity decline by 2.4 percent annually between 2014 and 2024, one of the worst performances among U.S. manufacturing industries.
March 2, 2026|Events
Tech Policy 202: Spring 2026 Educational Seminar Series for Congressional and Federal Staff
ITIF’s spring seminar course explores core emerging technologies and issues that are reshaping our world and, in the process, creating public policy challenges and opportunities. The course is open to congressional and federal staff only.
February 23, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to Department of Health and Human Services Regarding the Proposed GUARD Model
The international reference pricing-based GUARD model lacks a sound premise for its rationale, is fundamentally flawed in its design, and should be withdrawn in full by CMS.



