Biopharmaceutical Innovation
Navigate forward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
Navigate backward to interact with the calendar and select a date. Press the question mark key to get the keyboard shortcuts for changing dates.
The world is entering a promising golden age of life sciences innovation, with potentially enormous benefits for human health, productivity, and sustainability. But that vision is at risk from a host of forces that seek to hamper the fundamental business models that have enabled such innovation. ITIF’s Center for Life Sciences Innovation exists to fight back against such forces, while documenting the importance of life science innovation and the private-sector led model complemented by government support that has been so successful elevate. We conduct research, generate policy proposals, and convene members of the analytical and policymaking communities with this mission firmly in focus.

Associate Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read Bio
Executive Vice President, Global Innovation Policy
Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Read BioFeatured
Evidence to Inform Biopharmaceutical Policy: A Call for Research on the Impact of Public Policies on Investment in Drug Development

The scope and magnitude of the trade-off between immediate savings from lower drug prices and future health benefits from clinical development remain poorly understood and quantified. To support rigorous evaluations and inform evidence-based policymaking, it is crucial to invest in this area through research grants and improved access to federal and private data.
Evidence-Based Biopharmaceutical Policymaking: Symposium Report

There is a need for more rigorous evidence and more recent, high-quality data to inform biopharmaceutical policymaking by shedding light on the relationship between pharmaceutical firms’ expectations of financial returns from new drugs and their ability to invest in further R&D to discover future generations of drugs.
More Publications and Events
July 27, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: Imposing MFN Pricing on Medicare and Medicaid Will Reduce Global Pharmaceutical R&D Investment by 48 Percent
Applying Most Favored Nation pricing to both Medicare and Medicaid—requiring U.S. prices for drugs that have already been launched to equal the lowest prices among a group of peer countries—is estimated to reduce U.S. pharmaceutical revenues by 49 percent and global pharmaceutical revenues by 31 percent.
July 22, 2026|Blogs
The FDA Should Not Allow Untested Peptides to Be Added Into Patients’ Medications
The FDA is considering allowing seven unapproved peptides—substantially sourced through a Chinese gray market—to be used by U.S. compounding pharmacies, despite its own scientists warning against it. Approving them would legitimize unvetted foreign suppliers and undermine evidence-based drug regulation.
July 20, 2026|Reports & Briefings
Commercializing Canadian Health Research: The Case for Targeting Grants and Increasing Overall Investment
Canada should significantly expand commercialization-focused grant programs through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and increase Canada’s overall health science research investments to a scale commensurate with global competition.
July 16, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Comments to USITC Regarding State Support and Pricing Practices by Chinese Biotechnology Firms
China has utilized numerous illegitimate tools in pursuit of global leadership in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, including IP theft, forced labor, and stealing genetic information. This must be met with a swift and forceful response from U.S. policymakers.
July 15, 2026|Testimonies & Filings
Testimony to the Special Committee on Aging Regarding Foreign Ownership and Control in America’s Drug Supply Chain
China is becoming an increasingly capable competitor in the global pharmaceutical industry, with growing strengths at every level of the biopharmaceutical supply chain. Responding to this challenge will require a comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy, with strong cross-agency collaboration, to advance U.S. biopharmaceutical competitiveness.
June 29, 2026|Reports & Briefings
China’s Burgeoning Biopharmaceutical Competitiveness Demands a US Response
China has become an increasingly capable competitor in the global biopharmaceutical industry. To remain competitive, the United States should double down on policies to ensure that it offers the world’s leading environment to support private sector life sciences innovation.
June 8, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: America’s Pharmaceutical Sector Supports 5 Million Jobs and Contributes $1.65 Trillion to Economic Output
The biopharmaceutical industry generated over $800 billion in direct output in the United States in 2022, and indirectly supported an additional $850 billion in output through its suppliers and other downstream sectors, for a total of $1.65 trillion in economic output.
June 2, 2026|Blogs
AI Drug Discovery Systems Could Strengthen Biopharmaceutical Innovation—If Policymakers Get the Incentives Right
AI systems like Robin could reshape early-stage drug discovery, but only if policymakers support the data, infrastructure, regulatory clarity, and incentives needed to scale them responsibly.
June 1, 2026|Blogs
Fact of the Week: Eliminating Cancer Deaths Would Generate $186 Trillion in Total Economic Benefits Over a 35-Year Period
If cancer deaths were to be fully eliminated by 2030, over the subsequent 35 years, 30.7 million deaths would be averted, saving 380 million years of life. These additional years of life would also yield substantial economic benefits, as each year of life generates economic value, increased productivity, and tax revenue.
May 12, 2026|Events
Lessons From Europe’s Loss of Biopharma Leadership, and Its Attempts to Recover
Watch now for an expert panel discussion on what Europe’s experience reveals about the risks of undermining biopharmaceutical innovation, how policy choices shape R&D investment and competitiveness, and what steps U.S. policymakers should take to sustain American leadership in life sciences.



