Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Biopharmaceutical Innovation

The world is entering a promising golden age of life sciences innovation, with potentially enormous benefits for human health, productivity, and sustainability. But that vision is at risk from a host of forces that seek to hamper the fundamental business models that have enabled such innovation. ITIF’s Center for Life Sciences Innovation exists to fight back against such forces, while documenting the importance of life science innovation and the private-sector led model complemented by government support that has been so successful elevate. We conduct research, generate policy proposals, and convene members of the analytical and policymaking communities with this mission firmly in focus.

Sandra Barbosu
Sandra Barbosu

Associate Director, Center for Life Sciences Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Stephen Ezell
Stephen Ezell

Executive Vice President, Global Innovation Policy

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio

Featured

Evidence to Inform Biopharmaceutical Policy: A Call for Research on the Impact of Public Policies on Investment in Drug Development

Evidence to Inform Biopharmaceutical Policy: A Call for Research on the Impact of Public Policies on Investment in Drug Development

The scope and magnitude of the trade-off between immediate savings from lower drug prices and future health benefits from clinical development remain poorly understood and quantified. To support rigorous evaluations and inform evidence-based policymaking, it is crucial to invest in this area through research grants and improved access to federal and private data.

Evidence-Based Biopharmaceutical Policymaking: Symposium Report

Evidence-Based Biopharmaceutical Policymaking: Symposium Report

There is a need for more rigorous evidence and more recent, high-quality data to inform biopharmaceutical policymaking by shedding light on the relationship between pharmaceutical firms’ expectations of financial returns from new drugs and their ability to invest in further R&D to discover future generations of drugs.

How Skeptics Misconstrue the Link Between Drug Prices and Innovation

How Skeptics Misconstrue the Link Between Drug Prices and Innovation

A recent article in the British Medical Journal contends “high drug prices” are neither necessary nor justified to sustain biopharmaceutical innovation. But it misrepresents and misinterprets the facts, highlighting how faulty the rationale is for drug price controls.

The Hidden Toll of Drug Price Controls: Fewer New Treatments and Higher Medical Costs for the World

The Hidden Toll of Drug Price Controls: Fewer New Treatments and Higher Medical Costs for the World

When nations implement pharmaceutical price controls, they reduce pharmaceutical revenues, which then reduces investments in further R&D, limiting future generations’ access to new novel treatments needed to fight diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, and diabetes.

Testimony to the Senate Finance Committee on “Prescription Drug Price Inflation”

Testimony to the Senate Finance Committee on “Prescription Drug Price Inflation”

Expenditures for retail prescriptions have been roughly stable for the past two decades as a share of total U.S. health-care expenditures. Instead of applying broad price controls, policymakers should promote affordability and mitigate out-of-pocket costs for individuals.

More Publications and Events

July 27, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: Imposing MFN Pricing on Medicare and Medicaid Will Reduce Global Pharmaceutical R&D Investment by 48 Percent

Applying Most Favored Nation pricing to both Medicare and Medicaid—requiring U.S. prices for drugs that have already been launched to equal the lowest prices among a group of peer countries—is estimated to reduce U.S. pharmaceutical revenues by 49 percent and global pharmaceutical revenues by 31 percent.

July 22, 2026|Blogs

The FDA Should Not Allow Untested Peptides to Be Added Into Patients’ Medications

The FDA is considering allowing seven unapproved peptides—substantially sourced through a Chinese gray market—to be used by U.S. compounding pharmacies, despite its own scientists warning against it. Approving them would legitimize unvetted foreign suppliers and undermine evidence-based drug regulation.

July 20, 2026|Reports & Briefings

Commercializing Canadian Health Research: The Case for Targeting Grants and Increasing Overall Investment

Canada should significantly expand commercialization-focused grant programs through the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) and increase Canada’s overall health science research investments to a scale commensurate with global competition.

July 16, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to USITC Regarding State Support and Pricing Practices by Chinese Biotechnology Firms

China has utilized numerous illegitimate tools in pursuit of global leadership in biopharmaceutical manufacturing, including IP theft, forced labor, and stealing genetic information. This must be met with a swift and forceful response from U.S. policymakers.

July 15, 2026|Testimonies & Filings

Testimony to the Special Committee on Aging Regarding Foreign Ownership and Control in America’s Drug Supply Chain

China is becoming an increasingly capable competitor in the global pharmaceutical industry, with growing strengths at every level of the biopharmaceutical supply chain. Responding to this challenge will require a comprehensive, whole-of-government strategy, with strong cross-agency collaboration, to advance U.S. biopharmaceutical competitiveness.

June 29, 2026|Reports & Briefings

China’s Burgeoning Biopharmaceutical Competitiveness Demands a US Response

China has become an increasingly capable competitor in the global biopharmaceutical industry. To remain competitive, the United States should double down on policies to ensure that it offers the world’s leading environment to support private sector life sciences innovation.

June 8, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: America’s Pharmaceutical Sector Supports 5 Million Jobs and Contributes $1.65 Trillion to Economic Output

The biopharmaceutical industry generated over $800 billion in direct output in the United States in 2022, and indirectly supported an additional $850 billion in output through its suppliers and other downstream sectors, for a total of $1.65 trillion in economic output.

June 2, 2026|Blogs

AI Drug Discovery Systems Could Strengthen Biopharmaceutical Innovation—If Policymakers Get the Incentives Right

AI systems like Robin could reshape early-stage drug discovery, but only if policymakers support the data, infrastructure, regulatory clarity, and incentives needed to scale them responsibly.

June 1, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: Eliminating Cancer Deaths Would Generate $186 Trillion in Total Economic Benefits Over a 35-Year Period

If cancer deaths were to be fully eliminated by 2030, over the subsequent 35 years, 30.7 million deaths would be averted, saving 380 million years of life. These additional years of life would also yield substantial economic benefits, as each year of life generates economic value, increased productivity, and tax revenue.

May 12, 2026|Events

Lessons From Europe’s Loss of Biopharma Leadership, and Its Attempts to Recover

Watch now for an expert panel discussion on what Europe’s experience reveals about the risks of undermining biopharmaceutical innovation, how policy choices shape R&D investment and competitiveness, and what steps U.S. policymakers should take to sustain American leadership in life sciences.

Back to Top