Skip to content
ITIF Logo
ITIF Search

Artificial Intelligence

As every sector of the global economy and nearly every facet of modern society undergo digital transformation, ITIF advocates for policies that spur not just the development of IT innovations, but more importantly their adoption and use throughout the economy. In the area of artificial intelligence, ITIF studies issues related to competitiveness, governance, ethics, development, and adoption.

Daniel Castro
Daniel Castro

Vice President and Director, Center for Data Innovation

Information Technology and Innovation Foundation

Read Bio
Matthew Kilcoyne
Matthew Kilcoyne

Policy Analyst

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio
Hodan Omaar
Hodan Omaar

Senior Policy Manager

Center for Data Innovation

Read Bio

Featured

Picking the Right Policy Solutions for AI Concerns

Picking the Right Policy Solutions for AI Concerns

Some concerns are legitimate, but others are not. Some require immediate regulatory responses, but many do not. And a few require regulations addressing AI specifically, but most do not.

Ten Principles for Regulation That Does Not Harm AI Innovation

Ten Principles for Regulation That Does Not Harm AI Innovation

Concerns about artificial intelligence have prompted policymakers to propose a variety of laws and regulations to create “responsible AI.” Unfortunately, many proposals would likely harm AI innovation because few have considered what “responsible regulation of AI” entails.

US AI Policy Report Card

US AI Policy Report Card

The 117th Congress was the most AI-focused congressional session in history with 130 AI bills proposed, so it is a good moment to take stock of U.S. AI policy accomplishments to date and identify areas where there is room for continued progress.

More Publications and Events

January 8, 2026|Blogs

Ten Ways Policymakers Should Respond to the Grok Bikini Fiasco

The Grok bikini controversy highlights real harms from AI misuse, but it also shows that the right response is enforcing existing laws, holding bad actors accountable, and pursuing tech-neutral, proportionate policies—rather than rushing into broad, AI-specific regulation that risks undermining free expression and innovation.

January 7, 2026|Blogs

New York’s AI Safety Law Claims National Alignment but Delivers Fragmentation

New York’s AI safety law claims alignment with California, but its small deviations create duplicative state requirements that fragment U.S. AI policy and increase compliance costs without improving safety.

January 5, 2026|Blogs

Top 10 Tech Policy Pronouncements, Prognostications, and Questions for 2026

If the year ahead in technology and innovation policy lives up to its potential, it could be a consequential one because there is a long list of important issues on the table. Herein, we offer 10 that are on top of our minds.

January 5, 2026|Blogs

Fact of the Week: Commuting Areas Far From AI Hotspots Experienced 17 Percent Lower Growth in AI Jobs

A report finds that firms that are 125 miles from the closest AI hotspot, defined as an area with over 1000 AI publications or patents, experienced 17 percent lower AI job growth between 2007 and 2019.

January 5, 2026|Blogs

How Yesterday’s Web-Crawling Policies Will Shape Tomorrow’s AI Leadership

The Internet may be forever, but regulatory frameworks should not be. Decisions made today about web crawling will help determine where the next generation of AI leadership emerges—whether in Europe, the United States, or elsewhere.

December 18, 2025|Blogs

AI’s Job Impact: Gains Outpace Losses

AI isn’t destroying jobs; it’s creating them. At least in 2024, the surge in AI activity and data center construction generated more jobs than AI displaced.

December 18, 2025|Blogs

Misunderstanding the British Industrial Revolution Is Reinforcing Technology Pessimism About AI

Detractors of capitalism argue that it took over fifty years for the British Industrial Revolution’s benefits to reach average workers. That narrative is at best contested and, at worst, wrong.

December 18, 2025|Blogs

Trump Administration Gets H200 Chip Sales to China Right and Wrong

The Trump administration’s decision to allow H200 chip sales to China is strategically sound because it keeps Chinese firms reliant on U.S. technology, supports American chipmakers’ R&D, and preserves U.S. competitive advantage, though imposing a 25 percent fee undermines these benefits.

December 15, 2025|Blogs

Will AI Be the Next Growth Engine? Let’s Hope So

If we’re lucky, AI will restore the productivity growth that has eluded us for 15 years—not through dystopian transformation, but through steady, incremental improvements across the economy.

December 15, 2025|Testimonies & Filings

Comments to International Trade Administration Regarding the American AI Exports Program

The Center for Data Innovation recommends that the establishment and implementation of the American AI Exports Program maximizes the expansion of U.S. AI technology and reinforces American leadership globally.

Back to Top