The Unfinished Radio Revolution: New Approaches to Handling Wireless Interference
Event Summary
Change is in the air: there are likely to be significant new spectrum allocations as a result of the National Broadband Plan, and the march of technology keeps offering new ways to increase the capacity of wireless systems.
However, the revolution begun by the end of "command and control" radio licensing and the shift to a more hands-off regime of flexible-use auctioned licenses and unlicensed operation is incomplete. For example, while there's wide agreement on the importance of flexible use, the debate over the merits of property rights vs. open access have left largely untouched the important matter of defining the optimal operating permissions and governance regime for any new allocations.
This half-day conference addresses a key unanswered question: How should radio operating rights be defined, assigned and enforced in order to obtain the maximum benefit from wireless operations?
There are clearly problems with cross-channel interference between diverse services. This event is a follow-on to a small-group summit on cross-channel interference at Silicon Flatirons last year that analyzed some of the thorny cases that have arisen. Inter-licensee conflict is greatest across boundaries of different uses, and the increasing diversity of radio uses and users will amplify this problem. The definition of cross-channel rights and responsibilities has, to date, been ad hoc; this approach is no longer sustainable given the increasing diversity of uses and users, and the need to pack operations ever closer together in order to meet the demand for wireless capacity.
This meeting brings together leading economic and legal thinkers to reframe the discussion and grapple with the neglected questions:
- Not just debating licenses vs. sharing vs. collective use, but designing an optimum rights regime for whichever of these modes is used
- Not just who should share with whom, but the rules, rights and procedures that would govern and motivate sharing
- Not just whether spectrum is being used efficiently today, but what kinds of rights and processes would motivate the most intensive use.
Leading scholars and practitioners will advance their proposals, and debate them in two panel discussions. Position papers from each of the presenters will be distributed at the event.
This event is co-sponsored by Silicon-Flatirons, IEEE-USA, CTIA, New America Foundation, and FCBA.
Welcome
Robert D. Atkinson, President, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
The Technical and Commercial Challenge, and a Policy Response
Pierre de Vries, Silicon Flatirons Senior Adjunct Fellow, University of Colorado
Dale Hatfield, Executive Director, Silicon Flatirons Center
Panel 1
Michael Calabrese, Senior Research Fellow, New America Foundation
Ellen Goodman, Professor of Law, Rutgers University-Camden
Bruce Jacobs, Partner, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Evan Kwerel, Office of Plans and Policy, Federal Communications Commission
Gregory Rosston, Professor, Stanford University
Moderator
Ari Fitzgerald, Partner, Hogan Lovells US LLP
Panel 2
Harold Feld, Legal Director, Public Knowledge
Thomas Hazlett, Professor, George Mason University
Michael Marcus, Marcus Spectrum Solutions LLC
Charla Rath, Vice President - Public Policy, Verizon
Moderator
Cheryl Tritt, Partner, Wilkinson Barker Knauer LLP
Wrap-Up
Pierre de Vries, Silicon Flatirons Senior Adjunct Fellow, University of Colorado