Publications: Joseph V. Coniglio
December 4, 2025
Comments to European Commission Regarding Joint Guidelines on the Interplay Between DMA and GDPR
Unfortunately, however complementary the objectives of protecting consumer privacy and promoting competition may be at a high level, complying with several key DMA prohibitions will undermine—not enhance—the privacy goals of the GDPR.
December 2, 2025
Toward a Truly “America First” Antitrust: Responding to Commissioner Meador
The dominance of antitrust’s old order on the right is probably over, and the battle for the soul of a conservative or “America First” antitrust has begun.
November 21, 2025
Comments to United Kingdom’s CMA Regarding Scale-ups and Competition Policy
While ITIF commends the CMA for asking whether competition policy is consistent with broader growth and competitiveness goals, in several respects the Discussion Paper appears to condone policies that would run counter to—not ensure—a faster growing and more globally competitive Britain.
November 19, 2025
DMA for the USA? Congress Has Better Priorities Than Overhauling Antitrust Law
Congress’s attention would be far better spent elsewhere than on overhauling American antitrust law with new digital rules.
November 12, 2025
Yes, Lina Khan Is a Marxist
The neo-Brandeisian movement cleverly repackages Marxist ideology under the guise of antitrust.
November 4, 2025
Big Tech Goes to SCOTUS? Google’s Petition in Epic v. Google Makes the Case
Google’s petition in Epic v. Google raises big questions about key antitrust liability and remedial standards, foreshadowing similar arguments on appeal in the DOJ v. Google search case.
October 24, 2025
Comments to EU Regarding the Draft Revised Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation and Technology Transfer Guidelines
ITIF supports most of the proposed updates to the Technology Transfer Block Exemption Regulation—especially those on market share thresholds, data licensing, and technology pools—but warns that the new safe harbour for licensing negotiation groups could enable anticompetitive buyer collusion and protectionist enforcement unless stricter safeguards are added.
October 12, 2025
Letter to the Prime Minister and National Assembly of Vietnam Regarding the Proposed Law on Digital Transformation
If enacted, the draft law may inadvertently harm Vietnamese consumers, stifle digital innovation, and complicate bilateral trade relations between the United States and Vietnam to the detriment of both nations.
October 2, 2025
Comments to the European Commission on the Revision of EU Antitrust Procedures
The antitrust procedural framework can be improved by measures that create a less burdensome and more objective evidentiary process, as well as provide investigated parties with greater access to the Commission’s complete file.
September 29, 2025
Response to NYT Guest Essay "Google Wins, We Lose"
DOJ’s proposed breakup never made sense. Judges are supposed to apply the law, not simply deliver the results desired by progressives and populists.
